Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: joes Newsgroups: comp.theory Subject: Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2024 11:05:16 -0000 (UTC) Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org) Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2024 11:05:16 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="2114256"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="nS1KMHaUuWOnF/ukOJzx6Ssd8y16q9UPs1GZ+I3D0CM"; User-Agent: Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a git.gnome.org/pan2) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 Bytes: 2011 Lines: 18 Am Sun, 30 Jun 2024 19:27:50 -0500 schrieb olcott: > On 6/30/2024 7:13 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >> On 6/30/24 8:00 PM, olcott wrote: >>> >>> THIS SEQUENCE CANNOT POSSIBLY RETURN WHY PERSISTENTLY LIE ABOUT IT? >>> >> But it does, just after H gives up its simulation. >> You have even show that with a simulation. > DDD correctly emulated by HHH calls an emulated HHH(DDD) > that emulates its own DDD that calls an emulated HHH(DDD) > that is either aborted at some point never returning or hits > out-of-memory error never returning Running out of memory is only a physical constraint of no concern to the theoretical behaviour. -- Am Fri, 28 Jun 2024 16:52:17 -0500 schrieb olcott: Objectively I am a genius.