Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Chris M. Thomasson" Newsgroups: sci.math Subject: Re: Does the number of nines increase? Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2024 15:32:24 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 11 Message-ID: References: <79JoZp5bHCH4hf4J9cxbLGeMvPE@jntp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2024 00:32:26 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="450a0e1462802decfe06d2fadc7d9026"; logging-data="957129"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19Sz22J+EE9VyXG+J9qtZrGR8gnS7OVnvs=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:juSsbmDMApLnK1Y1hw4lQ73RbKA= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: Bytes: 1714 On 7/15/2024 5:41 AM, WM wrote: > Le 14/07/2024 à 17:27, Moebius a écrit : > >> For each and every x e IR, x > 0: NUF(x) = aleph_0 > > Wrong. All unit fractions are separated. Therefore there is a first one > at y. NUF(y) = 1. There is a first unit fraction at 1/1. There is no last unit fraction. Get over it man!