Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: joes <noreply@example.org>
Newsgroups: sci.math,alt.crackpot
Subject: Re: Does the number of nines increase?
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2024 13:21:12 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <a2718d6dcd508b57d4b840b2f1a60c15ec40ae03@i2pn2.org>
References: <tJf9P9dALSN4l2XH5vdqPbXSA7o@jntp> <v66dt9$2pshb$1@dont-email.me>
	<s69SKdr5WAc5QNsq4K2TQ8Pj3bQ@jntp>
	<a74583f7-0dc1-45e7-8744-5a950dd205f3@att.net>
	<srZHqMPnM-ePTk3obwq5XZrN9-s@jntp>
	<89d87a83-55b7-4d4f-bd48-e57f9fb71306@att.net>
	<DuCuIXoZJgQvFwpgl-CdKL6BiiM@jntp>
	<b8d894a3-1c18-4fd6-a01a-4a40d190df80@att.net>
	<AorII1f7PWb6eMa2Lfl7MFs-xLU@jntp>
	<74434c50-c747-4bce-853d-b7f8a9d0ef50@att.net>
	<-8_ECzK8niPUPiyxStcpsZWzJqA@jntp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2024 13:21:12 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="2688747"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="nS1KMHaUuWOnF/ukOJzx6Ssd8y16q9UPs1GZ+I3D0CM";
User-Agent: Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a
 git.gnome.org/pan2)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 2961
Lines: 38

Am Tue, 09 Jul 2024 12:08:46 +0000 schrieb WM:
> Le 09/07/2024 à 02:15, Jim Burns a écrit :
>> On 7/8/2024 3:57 PM, WM wrote:
>>> Le 08/07/2024 à 19:33, Jim Burns a écrit :
>> 
>>>> A change needs be _with respect to_ something,
>>> yes, to the value befor that point.
>> Yes, for example, floor(0) with respect to floor(0-ε)
>> Or, yes, to the value after that point
> No, my definition _for this concrete case_ is this: A change of NUF(x)
> happens at point x if for all y < x NUF(x) > NUF(y).
Why this direction of less/greater than?

>> Does each nonempty set S of unit.fractionsᵂᴹ hold a largest element?
> A largest and a smallest. Alas the smallest can only be found if it is
> not dark.
Why should there be a smallest element?

>> Does each unit.fractionᵂᴹ u (including 1)
>> have a next.smaller unit.fractionᵂᴹ ⅟(1+⅟u) ?
> Obviously not, as I have demonstrated irrefutably (refuted only by
> people who cannot think clear enough. But every unit fraction that can
> be named has a next smaller unit fraction.
"Named", which is all of them.

>> Does each unit.fractionᵂᴹ v (excluding 1)
>> have a next.larger unit.fractionᵂᴹ ⅟(-1+⅟v) ?
> Yes, but for all dark unit fractions this cannot be found. Every unit
> fraction excluding 1/1 that can be named has a next larger unit
> fraction.

>> Or is  what you're talking about irrelevant to what you're saying?
> Relevant is this and only this: NUF(0) = 0, and the first step happens
> at x > 0. Like every step it is a step by 1.
The only step is at 0.

-- 
Am Fri, 28 Jun 2024 16:52:17 -0500 schrieb olcott:
Objectively I am a genius.