Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: sci.logic
Subject: This makes all Analytic(Olcott) truth computable
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2024 10:29:18 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 47
Message-ID: <v95cke$p5rb$5@dont-email.me>
References: <v86olp$5km4$1@dont-email.me> <v8a4vf$uhll$1@dont-email.me>
 <v8aqh7$11ivs$1@dont-email.me> <v8cr4g$1gk19$1@dont-email.me>
 <v8dinp$1kii7$1@dont-email.me> <v8hv72$2mmsq$1@dont-email.me>
 <v8iisj$2qetj$1@dont-email.me> <v8kuhb$3d5q8$1@dont-email.me>
 <v8lc7p$3f6vr$2@dont-email.me> <v8naa8$3uo7s$1@dont-email.me>
 <v8nqo7$1n09$1@dont-email.me> <v8sm9o$1gk42$1@dont-email.me>
 <v8t2fl$1ilg6$2@dont-email.me> <v8v97m$2cofk$1@dont-email.me>
 <v8vusp$32fso$16@dont-email.me> <v91p95$3ppav$1@dont-email.me>
 <v92q4f$37e9$1@dont-email.me> <v94l1p$ldq7$1@dont-email.me>
 <v95c2j$p5rb$4@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2024 17:29:18 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="bb86fb6b7518b299c8da34bf84593b17";
	logging-data="825195"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19mAmgBX9CMhj4b0qaGn6c+"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:5V+C6KjqDUD9kcQUBvZfOZVuRe8=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <v95c2j$p5rb$4@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 3260

On 8/9/2024 10:19 AM, olcott wrote:
> On 8/9/2024 3:46 AM, Mikko wrote:
>> On 2024-08-08 16:01:19 +0000, olcott said:
>>
>>>
>>> It does seem that he is all hung up on not understanding
>>> how the synonymity of bachelor and unmarried works.
>>
>> What in the synonymity, other than the synonymity itself,
>> would be relevant to Quine's topic?
>>
> 
> He mentions it 98 times in his paper
> https://www.ditext.com/quine/quine.html
> I haven't looked at it in years.
> 
>>> I don't really give a rat's ass what he said all that matters
>>> to me is that I have defined expressions of language that are
>>> {true on the basis of their meaning expressed in language}
>>> so that I have analytic(Olcott) to make my other points.
>>
>> That does not justify lying.
>>
> 
> I never lie. Sometimes I make mistakes.
> It looks like you only want to dodge the actual
> topic with any distraction that you can find.
> 
> Expressions of language that are {true on the basis of
> their meaning expressed in this same language} defines
> analytic(Olcott) that overcomes any objections that
> anyone can possibly have about the analytic/synthetic
> distinction.
> 

Expressions of language that are {true on the basis of
their meaning expressed in this same language} defines
analytic(Olcott) that overcomes any objections that
anyone can possibly have about the analytic/synthetic
distinction.

This makes all Analytic(Olcott) truth computable or the
expression is simply untrue because it lacks a truthmaker.

-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer