Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!reader5.news.weretis.net!news.solani.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Mild Shock Newsgroups: comp.lang.prolog Subject: Alan Kay's Dynabook fueled by Prolog? (Was: Holy Grail makes People Disappear) Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2024 18:20:26 +0200 Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2024 16:20:25 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: solani.org; logging-data="692674"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@news.solani.org" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/91.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.18.2 Cancel-Lock: sha1:0/14GsnlFVeDJLEijltuUUU7hdI= In-Reply-To: X-User-ID: eJwNyMkBwCAIBMCWRA6hHFnc/ktI5jmuIYFj4WFOZ5Q4F9NjP2RLCe7zgFrjULcuO5dNjOVf3JO3FVUFjs7+AFuCFl4= Bytes: 2434 Lines: 47 Hi, The paper mentions: "Huge computing power of our modern laptops". If I look at my new iPad Pro M4 2024, I would say "Huge computing power of tablets", measurement have shown it is almost twice as fast as my laptops form ca. 2020. So lets do the following: Bring LPTP to Dogelog Player? Bye P.S.: This would give a new spin of Alan Key's vision of Dynabook. Can we run the Dynabook idea on Prolog? Joe Armstrong interviews Alan Kay https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fhOHn9TClXY Mild Shock schrieb: > Hi, > > I remember Robert Stärk's disappearing from > academic life at ETH Zurich all of a sudden. > Did Ulrich Neumerkel now also disappeared not > > because the Scryer Prolog disaster, but after > he figured out that failure slices are not hip > enought? What could be more hip, are the modalities > > of Robert Stärk's logic more hip now and even useful? > > Automated Theorem Proving for Prolog Verification > Fred Mesnard etc.. May 2024 > https://lim.univ-reunion.fr/staff/fred/Publications/24-MesnardMP-slides.pdf > > Disclaimer: I am not deep into this theory, > it has some ingredients that were floating around > the 80's / 80's, not only in the millieau of ETH Zurich, > > but also in the vincinity of Gehard Jaeger, Bern. > There are many alternative formalizations that > can express termination etc.. But maybe LPTP is > > especially suited for Prolog?