Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: AMuzi Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech Subject: Re: Disc brake maintenance tips Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2024 14:50:22 -0500 Organization: Yellow Jersey, Ltd. Lines: 59 Message-ID: References: <7d9f8jhl4vpb0n7p8bodavodbrob28rd8p@4ax.com> <0mnf8j1od86gq027k6bbas1ioeam2a6l6b@4ax.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sun, 07 Jul 2024 21:50:21 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="1a6f6239f94885ffe7dbc3638e8f8e27"; logging-data="496035"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18daesagF5P6DgHFIOAvSeO" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:lyGINSIChlbYOM3r/a+wmhlnSEY= In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 3725 On 7/7/2024 1:44 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote: > On 7/7/2024 11:13 AM, AMuzi wrote: >> On 7/6/2024 10:59 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote: >>> As I've said before, our constitution was groundbreaking. >>> But it was never perfect, and in many ways it was and is >>> faulty. >>> >>> Other nations were able to examine our constitution, note >>> its faults and correct them when writing theirs. One >>> common correction is not letting every whacko buy and use >>> rapid fire weaponry designed for military use. >>> >> >> What's rapid?  A revolver? >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WzHG-ibZaKM > > We've discussed this at length. Before we could have any > hope of numbers we can agree upon, we'd first have to have a > rational discussion on the legitimate uses of firearms by > members of the public. > > I doubt that's going to happen here - in part because on one > hand, you (justifiably) excoriate punks doing things like > blasting away at convenience stores with AR rifles; but on > the other hand, you say that almost anyone should be able to > buy an AR rifle at will. > > I don't think there's a way to get past that cognitive > dissonance. But if you want to try, tell me what firearm > uses by ordinary citizens you consider legitimate. > >> I can't think of anything on earth which hasn't been >> applied to military purposes (David, sling, 5 stones...) > > My phrase was clearly not condemning public use of > _everything_ ever designed for military use. Read again and > see. > Yes that's exactly right. Automobile crashes kill some 44,000-ish people a year here (plus carbon monoxide deaths, autos crushed aspiring mechanics in driveways and so on). In theory, we regulate pilot behavior*. Again in theory, we track vehicle ownership*. In theory, we even regulate who may* pilot one on public roads. Yet there's no serious discussion (outside the loony left) of banning autos altogether. *Each a hotly contested web of difficult policy and practice, which are now very different. -- Andrew Muzi am@yellowjersey.org Open every day since 1 April, 1971