Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Chris Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone Subject: Re: iPhone battery questions... Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2024 16:17:37 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 27 Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2024 18:17:37 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="0d15f28c54460f2bb39ef85e9eff9a7c"; logging-data="3728952"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18sXrskVl5HYdZ6tRiqWZebKwH53Fz8zSo=" User-Agent: NewsTap/5.5 (iPhone/iPod Touch) Cancel-Lock: sha1:v85eU8FwfWYnRvTzA8ywba0PqEQ= sha1:tWl1mprZDfPQrw7khdPpSBaGjIw= Bytes: 2128 Andrew wrote: > Chris wrote on Sat, 15 Jun 2024 09:05:20 -0000 (UTC) : > >> Unsurprising as most have much larger batteries. If you compare >> efficiencies the difference is much smaller e.g. > > Chris, > > Alan Baker has zero education, let alone knowledge of battery chemistry. > Alan Baker has absolutely no concept of what battery life actually means. Interesting that you chose to attack Alan rather that address the point. Clearly that means you have no argument against what he (and I) said. > The fact remains that the single most important determinant of overall > battery life (I'm talking years, not hours) is the battery capacity. Are you going for a record of the most wrong things stated in a week? You're doing great. Carry on! > The fact remains that the iPhone uses cheap substandard capacity batteries. Not a fact.