Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?J=C3=B6rg_Lorenz?= Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone Subject: Re: Apple accused of underreporting suspected CSAM on its platforms Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2024 18:40:27 +0200 Organization: Camembert Normand au Lait Cru Lines: 26 Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2024 18:40:27 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="4bb2e88d07ac17a31fd9c97f629893ac"; logging-data="1362876"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19eHrLgpXsra2VLo7P3SseDOIl+0+AKBRs=" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:115.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/115.12.2 Cancel-Lock: sha1:nQH9eJ/pDhpqwCblWYrosXkGiU8= In-Reply-To: Content-Language: de-CH, en-GB Bytes: 2309 Am 23.07.24 um 18:27 schrieb Chris: > Jörg Lorenz wrote: >> Am 23.07.24 um 13:31 schrieb Chris: >>> After being a bit skeptical of Apple's solution, I realised it was a pretty >>> good and pragmatic balance between respecting people's privacy and >>> protecting vulnerable people. I was disappointed that the angry "muh >>> freedom" brigade scuppered it. >> >> It was neither a good nor an acceptable solution. This being the reason >> why Apple decided against it in the end. > > It was sunk by reactionary know-it-alls. If anyone bothered looked at the > technology - which Apple published openly - they would have seen it was > pretty elegant and privacy preserving. > > It could have been a really good tool to protect children, but no, people's > non-rights were more important. You reaction is Nazi-style: At no point in the discussion you wanted to protect innocent children. You probably have a hidden agenda. Bigot religious groups are the biggest risk to free Western societies. -- "Gutta cavat lapidem." (Ovid)