Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: comp.arch Subject: Re: Byte ordering Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2024 16:00:38 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 13 Message-ID: References: <550600971b1a36b4b630c496cb21b96b@www.novabbs.org> <0194054dac788f7e3a163726e84d72ac@www.novabbs.org> <2024Oct3.113903@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <2024Oct4.193007@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <2024Oct5.201155@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <20241005225335.00002fa4@yahoo.com> <20241007195744.0000483e@yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2024 22:00:38 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="e4af6d4fc32c30cab8f0367293c1992d"; logging-data="1940730"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18fb5dYdUKThUeDF+CYoYQiBGZbWpHRHYc=" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cancel-Lock: sha1:hicp9u7CbHSg9v36IeZiCmHyHzw= sha1:qujexbtd0AUuEkDb/kmPlMPN1Cc= Bytes: 2030 > Not every PC made in those years was crap. Some of them were quite > reliable and lasted long. But back then, Dennard scaling meant that an 8 year-old PC was so much slower than a current PC that it was difficult to find people willing to still use it. Nowadays, for a large proportion of tasks, you can't really tell the difference between a last-generation CPU and an 8 year-old CPU, so the reliability is much more of a factor. Stefan