Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: =?utf-8?Q?Re:_Celle-l=C3=A0_est_trop_belle,_je_l'encadre._?=
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2024 12:28:41 +0300
Organization: -
Lines: 13
Message-ID: <v9kho9$tkqt$1@dont-email.me>
References: <sXx0CReRczdocHus8Ot0NQQEIX0@jntp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2024 11:28:41 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="12fc9c697b40d6367e6f93c8d12f250c";
	logging-data="971613"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19tuNJyqEujAxkhMNQozLwO"
User-Agent: Unison/2.2
Cancel-Lock: sha1:DBFS0sbhZ2zwa2zCAqEtEz9VyiY=
Bytes: 1297

On 2024-08-14 17:28:56 +0000, Richard Hachel said:

>  "There is no such thing as "universal anisochrony": it is a false notion.
> You're conflating time dilation (a real phenomenon) with something else."
>                                         g.harnagel
> Trop beau.
> R.H.

There is no "anisochrony" until you define "isochrony".

-- 
Mikko