Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Mikko Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: Sync two clocks Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2024 15:18:01 +0300 Organization: - Lines: 24 Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2024 14:18:02 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="bfc65ec5aa48ce91b41c9d094026f89c"; logging-data="968567"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+x5lAmeXhUrhRGdyHKw+4O" User-Agent: Unison/2.2 Cancel-Lock: sha1:oa9RFC08pzTHsSQrkC8ry3bxBps= Bytes: 1929 On 2024-08-23 10:58:35 +0000, Richard Hachel said: > Le 23/08/2024 à 07:41, Thomas Heger a écrit : >> >> Whether this is actually true or not is irrelevant here, because you >> need to compensate the delay somehow. Otherwise you would get a 'mutual >> time stretching' effect, what cannot be a real physical effect, because >> it is visible only at the far side by the remote observer. >> >> Since both of these observers are of equal rights, both could claim the >> other time reading invalid, hence both readings ARE invalid. >> >> Therefore you must compensate the delay 'by hand'. >> ... >> >> TH > > Beaucoup de choses intéressantes dans ce post. If you believe a fool you are a fool. -- Mikko