Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Space-time interval (2)
Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2024 11:14:25 +0300
Organization: -
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <v9pm51$1rdf2$1@dont-email.me>
References: <YqTjbAPdSf8P-veYFHQCI8eskLU@jntp> <v9dmer$3dtvr$3@dont-email.me> <3lzcd1NKCT13xkV8yvlh8oaa3Mg@jntp> <v9fdeg$3rh2a$1@dont-email.me> <jBxUcP6BzIhx3lL1WyQctHmm7jo@jntp> <v9g6ij$3vsfg$1@dont-email.me> <AVa827R_LOez7mc5Ad3CT6GyhiA@jntp> <327c4ebc77dc16239ac38f00b508451b@www.novabbs.com> <ZmtVAt4HhKe0jdT-a3px1duKdmw@jntp> <v9i8c5$bvnu$9@dont-email.me> <VOohu46_lYfs6YEQG8qZQKYepNw@jntp> <v9ia7k$bvnu$11@dont-email.me> <FxxcAtB-BaU4TzfE-6Txlbo_gEA@jntp> <v9kiq7$tput$1@dont-email.me> <EtDoDs0BPVkZJTF9Hcr7blKk9p0@jntp> <v9nfir$1e6i8$1@dont-email.me> <NCMZlHRuo1p_S6DXG_aN0gMczys@jntp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2024 10:14:26 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="129c142c9cce33919a33ea59b2adcd14";
	logging-data="1947106"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18CATwVDUUrpY4O5i1VRwst"
User-Agent: Unison/2.2
Cancel-Lock: sha1:s1dsrIZiVoNLiHyLdfHBilV/HSM=
Bytes: 1881

On 2024-08-16 12:38:05 +0000, Richard Hachel said:

> Le 16/08/2024 à 14:10, Mikko a écrit :
>>>> 
>>>> No, it does not. A watch may be set to show that time or another time and
>>>> it shows as it was set.
>>> 
>>> That's not what I'm talking about.
>> 
>> Yes, you were. You said "each watch will lag behind the other".
> 
> If we do a type M synchronization as I explained in the previous post.

No, you stated it unconditionally.

-- 
Mikko