Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Python <python@invalid.org>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: the notion of counter-intuitiveness in relativistic physics
Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2024 18:32:03 +0200
Organization: CCCP
Lines: 45
Message-ID: <v984m3$mn9k$3@dont-email.me>
References: <GBEGTHyJnMpjHuJ0IoZO0OLSc1M@jntp>
 <AE2L2lzGJn13Z_4dg3bpJC59QsA@jntp> <66b3d79f$0$3656$426a74cc@news.free.fr>
 <dlVAS4dgp1D4i_LVHm3d5U9hqow@jntp>
 <43ee5c178f7ae877c0c3e00e77386494@www.novabbs.com>
 <xHQxwI0qFFk4RXIOP_V9qQEYF6o@jntp>
 <03be6498d21bfde3edbac3669f10841c@www.novabbs.com>
 <17ea67a48e5596d2$254537$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com>
 <df7a10a82cd895126e0d5ceafa835a8f@www.novabbs.com>
 <v983k7$mn9k$2@dont-email.me> <MZ-3-Ki6l-hJvQNpXF6G0CD2OLo@jntp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2024 18:32:04 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="2c68c9b0e49d709379cb2ac2360b1bf3";
	logging-data="744756"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/NKjKXBj7bnjuT1SeOMuVz"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:q17mtndpUA8yh1rRMpU0Bo6jDvM=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <MZ-3-Ki6l-hJvQNpXF6G0CD2OLo@jntp>
Bytes: 3128

Le 10/08/2024 à 18:26, Richard Hachel a écrit :
> Le 10/08/2024 à 18:14, Python a écrit :
>> Le 10/08/2024 à 18:09, gharnagel a écrit :
>>> On Sat, 10 Aug 2024 15:29:23 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>>>>
>>>> W dniu 10.08.2024 o 15:02, gharnagel pisze:
>>>> >
>>>> > At first, Einstein was ignored, and it took quite a while for
>>>> > the PTB to come around.  But it didn't happen until experimental
>>>> > evidence prevailed.
>>>>
>>>> Only such an idiot believe these nonsensical
>>>> ideological lies, Harrie, and the mumble of
>>>> the idiot was not even consistent.
>>>
>>> Wozzie has told so many lies, he can't discern truth from his
>>> outrageous fantasies :-))
>>
>> It is actually not a lie if he really believes his fallacious claims
>> to be true.
>>
>> IMHO he is demented and dumb enough to actually believe his unsound
>> "arguments".
> 
> Ah, te voilà, toi?
> 
> Je te croyais disparu sous la claque que tu t'es prise, et qui portait 
> sur Nostradamus.
> 
> Je t'ai demandé d'expliquer le quatrain (ce que j'ai fait, et qui n'a 
> rien à voir avec tes conneries de Louis XIV) et de me montrer si, avec 
> tes immenses talents d'historiens ou de critique, tu pouvais me prouver 
> que cela avait été écris avant 1660.
> Magnes toi un peu les couilles, au lieu de faire le con sur usenet.

[for non French-speaking readers: M.D. Richard "Hachel" Lengrand is
babbling some unclear claims about Nostradamus' "predictions" here]

I don't give a sh*t on this new stupid hobby of yours. I would,
anyway, be concerned if I lived in Saint-Izan-de-Soudiac and a
local country Doctor was fond of this kind of demented nonsense.