Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Ruvim <ruvim.pinka@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth
Subject: Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?
Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2024 21:52:31 +0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <vcplh0$25spg$3@dont-email.me>
References: <v5fjkr$1p13i$1@dont-email.me>
 <2024Jun26.094910@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <v5gs5j$23lka$2@dont-email.me>
 <2024Jun28.175045@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <v5p51t$3utd9$2@dont-email.me>
 <6680c10c$1@news.ausics.net> <v5s019$jbd6$1@dont-email.me>
 <v5s0d3$jbd6$2@dont-email.me>
 <bf66af7e3abb6d49d1e6ff2935802477@www.novabbs.com>
 <v5s8a8$ksnb$1@dont-email.me>
 <5c6520a0dd123d02281bb631ae5389dc@www.novabbs.com>
 <v5t1ui$sl14$1@dont-email.me> <v5tral$10nj0$1@dont-email.me>
 <vcn79g$1n7h4$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2024 19:52:32 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="549a3fe37f3214051d88622e687b5f68";
	logging-data="2290480"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/P8aqlOClUWk24hTPXAamQ"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:0ChpuSzii7AaArl4frl18zoK2JI=
In-Reply-To: <vcn79g$1n7h4$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 1887

On 2024-09-21 23:37, Anthony Howe wrote:
> On 2024-07-01 05:02, Ruvim wrote:
>> And if the term "minimum search order" is renamed to "small search 
>> order" (as an example), will this solve the problem?
> 
> Minimum functional search order?
> 

Good idea!

Similar variants:
   - minimum usable search order
   - minimum operable search order
   - minimum operative search order
   - minimum operational search order

--
Ruvim