Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!panix!.POSTED.2602:f977:0:1::5!not-for-mail From: Rich Alderson Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers,comp.os.linux.misc Subject: Re: The joy of FORTRAN Date: 01 Oct 2024 17:40:56 -0400 Organization: PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC Lines: 21 Sender: alderson+news@panix5.panix.com Message-ID: References: <5mqdnZuGq4lgwm_7nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@earthlink.com> <1r0e6u9.1tubjrt1kapeluN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> <156256844.748909906.434683.peter_flass-yahoo.com@news.eternal-september.org> <1696219735.749088927.121438.peter_flass-yahoo.com@news.eternal-september.org> Injection-Info: reader1.panix.com; posting-host="2602:f977:0:1::5"; logging-data="5771"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@panix.com" X-Newsreader: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 22.3 Bytes: 2030 Lawrence D'Oliveiro writes: > On Mon, 30 Sep 2024 14:26:54 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >> Because his theory that all spaces could be replaced with tabs, was not >> applicable to padded string literals inside the code itself > The algorithm was wrong. The correct way that "tabify" and "untabify" work > in Emacs, for example, is to only process the leading whitespace on the > line. Wrong. They operate on every occurrence of in the file, or replace appropriate numbers of s with an equivalently place . I use these nearly every fucking day. You're flat out wrong. -- Rich Alderson news@alderson.users.panix.com Audendum est, et veritas investiganda; quam etiamsi non assequamur, omnino tamen proprius, quam nunc sumus, ad eam perveniemus. --Galen