Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connectionsPath: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro Newsgroups: comp.unix.shell,comp.unix.programmer,comp.lang.misc Subject: Re: Python (was Re: I did not inhale) Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2024 07:22:17 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 21 Message-ID: References: <20240408075547.000061e8@gmail.com> <20240412094809.811@kylheku.com> <87il0mm94y.fsf@tudado.org> <87il0lldf8.fsf@tudado.org> <20240815182717.189@kylheku.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2024 09:22:18 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="e67b5fd56ab8be94cd7ba99433918e9e"; logging-data="3473907"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19A1RDqUwBz5+EOFSDKTNoX" User-Agent: Pan/0.159 (Vovchansk; ) Cancel-Lock: sha1:fzidYMckrVY60SgOUWGalDpQCs8= Bytes: 2641 On Tue, 20 Aug 2024 08:57:07 +0200, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote: > On 2024-08-20 01:03, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: > >> On Mon, 19 Aug 2024 13:03:23 +0200, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote: >> >>> Again. It is called overlapped I/O. You can start multiple >>> *asynchronous* I/O operations from a thread. >> >> I’m not talking about using threads. I’m talking about avoiding >> threads, and all their potential for difficult-to-fix race-condition >> -type bugs. >> >> I’m talking about situations where the bottleneck is the I/O, not the >> CPU, so multithreading gets you nothing. > > It seems you suffer some form of dyslexia. I clearly stated that all > instances of overlapped I/O is started from the same/single/one thread. > Better now? Do I need to repeat that this has nothing to do with threading?