Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.karotte.org!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: rbowman <bowman@montana.com>
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Multiple Inheritance [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]
Date: 4 Oct 2024 03:46:15 GMT
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <lm96o7Fr43iU2@mid.individual.net>
References: <pan$96411$d204da43$cc34bb91$1fe98651@linux.rocks>
	<5mqdnZuGq4lgwm_7nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@earthlink.com>
	<vcub5c$36h63$1@dont-email.me> <1r0e6u9.1tubjrt1kapeluN%snipeco.2@gmail.com>
	<vcuib9$37rge$5@dont-email.me> <vcvuhh$3hroa$2@dont-email.me>
	<llhieuF8ej2U2@mid.individual.net> <20240925083451.00003205@gmail.com>
	<Pascal-20240925164718@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de>
	<mdd4j63pmo1.fsf_-_@panix5.panix.com>
	<oJ-cnQSrLZDYdGX7nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@earthlink.com>
	<vdatb6$1l4ch$8@dont-email.me> <vdauah$1lq1u$1@dont-email.me>
	<lltt6uF4fseU4@mid.individual.net> <vdcn1q$1tmdr$5@dont-email.me>
	<vddqoe$264fi$2@dont-email.me> <vdf4le$2cn51$6@dont-email.me>
	<vdh2l1$2p7e2$1@dont-email.me> <vdhqm7$2t1fi$3@dont-email.me>
	<vdlirb$3kuh8$1@dont-email.me> <vdn3n1$3ssv4$4@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net P71QxTXyVHuAwjcRkA8MSwE75ht6wFpcsLd2EfgjVasfyDR/iY
Cancel-Lock: sha1:a0P0HLw1AMALE/z92EWoofoif3A= sha256:eYTpXZ27yEj9+lG+PpuZWc+gFcF+Q77XapZi0YjR0wQ=
User-Agent: Pan/0.149 (Bellevue; 4c157ba)
Bytes: 2598

On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 21:52:34 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:

> Some languages manage to be simpler, and yet more powerful, than others.
> Compare Python to Java or C++, for example.

Shall we talk about speed? 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MS_BM-bJnds

Spoiler alert: MicroPython wins for ease of use and rapid development. 
However if you want microsecond granularity, clean PWM control, robust 
interrupt handling, and other things that may be important in a 
microprocessor project, go for C++. 

The same applies to standard Python and C/C++. Python has seen speed 
improvements in recent years. I don't know how much 3.13 will add when it 
hits the streets. I really enjoy Python but I also know its limitations. 
It's back to having a variety of tools in the toolbox and knowing when to 
use each one.

As far as code completion and so forth I use VS Code with PyLance and 
IntellicCode

https://devblogs.microsoft.com/python/announcing-pylance-fast-feature-
rich-language-support-for-python-in-visual-studio-code/

It's another tool.