Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: ChatGPT explains why rebuttals of my work are incorrect
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2024 20:25:41 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 72
Message-ID: <vev1ql$3i2oe$2@dont-email.me>
References: <veco64$hk5$4@dont-email.me> <vecrqv$1bav$2@dont-email.me>
 <vedfnq$43kg$1@dont-email.me> <veef3v$93ft$1@dont-email.me>
 <veeinu$9l7s$1@dont-email.me> <20241013093342.546@kylheku.com>
 <vei1aq$11jh4$1@dont-email.me> <vek594$1c3q7$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2024 03:25:42 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="a2f4596ff028e636d7320aa11ac5f85c";
	logging-data="3738382"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19pHY3gqRIZzZtGDhXjO3v8"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:fpQ+1Ng26hUX0Y5Qr+Ycsj5oG1g=
Content-Language: en-US
X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 241018-10, 10/18/2024), Outbound message
In-Reply-To: <vek594$1c3q7$1@dont-email.me>
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Bytes: 3342

On 10/14/2024 5:17 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> On 10/13/2024 7:57 PM, olcott wrote:
>> On 10/13/2024 11:34 AM, Kaz Kylheku wrote:
>>> On 2024-10-12, Chris M. Thomasson <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On 10/12/2024 11:28 AM, Janis Papanagnou wrote:
>>>>> On 12.10.2024 11:32, Jan van den Broek wrote:
>>>>>> 2024-10-12, Chris M. Thomasson <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> 
>>>>>> schrieb:
>>>>>>> On 10/11/2024 7:50 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [Schnipp]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As I see it, the main Halting Problem is Olcott not halting.
>>>>>
>>>>> LOL! - A very nice one. Thanks for that. :-)
>>>>
>>>> I second that. :^)
>>>
>>> You're likely thousand-seconding that. The Olcott not halting joke
>>> is many years old now, and will likely come up again.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> My cancer has gotten worse.
>>
>> *ChatGPT explains why rebuttals of my work are incorrect*
>> https://chatgpt.com/share/6709e046-4794-8011-98b7-27066fb49f3e
>>
>> I had to dumb this down from the original halting problem
>> input so that reviewers can verify that HHH is correct
>> without hardly paying any attention at all:
>>
>> void DDD()
>> {
>>    HHH(DDD);
>>    return;
>> }
>>
>> When HHH is an x86 emulation based termination analyzer
>> then each DDD emulated by any HHH that it calls never returns.
> [...]
> 
> Isn't that similar to:
> 
> void foobar()
> {
>      foobar();
> }
> 
> ?
> 

Yes thus you can see that the conventional halting
problem input is also infinitely recursive to every
emulating termination analyzer.

DD emulated by HHH never reaches past its first line.

int DD()
{
   int Halt_Status = HHH(DD);
   if (Halt_Status)
     HERE: goto HERE;
   return Halt_Status;
}

Fully operational code with embedded x86 emulator.
https://github.com/plolcott/x86utm/blob/master/Halt7.c

-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer