Path: ...!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2024 17:53:44 +0000 From: BTR1701 Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv,rec.music.misc Subject: Re: "F-You": Megyn Kelly Blasts Taylor Swift Endorsement Of Kamala References: User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.5.3b3 (Intel Mac OS X) Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2024 10:53:29 -0700 Message-ID: Lines: 58 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com X-Trace: sv3-oQvVvnpIdVivdtebTQmS8Iez5ixR3hkL3Vphmvs3X2H/KZqYD24+9X2q4+2lfyQ9X+C3z+s9IPgZ2bl!ETaFmZty29z9h/fHJW84GAzc+ASn92++mYe0orw9pNbHsmGgCnhmc67XBB3+4BXRKt/JovPRdzAK!+fc= X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 Bytes: 3856 In article , moviePig wrote: > On 9/24/2024 12:58 AM, BTR1701 wrote: > > moviePig wrote: > >> On 9/23/2024 1:29 PM, BTR1701 wrote: > >>> In article , moviePig > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> On 9/22/2024 6:57 PM, BTR1701 wrote: > >>>>> In article , moviePig > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> On 9/22/2024 5:44 PM, BTR1701 wrote: > >>>>>>> What can we conclude from this data? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Well, first and foremost, that the propagandists at the > >>>>>>> L.A. Times are full of shit. They're literally lying to > >>>>>>> promote an agenda. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> September is a hot month in L.A. and has been going back > >>>>>>> to the 1800s, long before SUVs, carbon footprints, > >>>>>>> 'climate change'. And notably, while there are some > >>>>>>> record highs set post-2000, not one of them is in 2024, > >>>>>>> which makes the Times' claim that our current heat wave > >>>>>>> is 'record heat' or is 'breaking records' a complete > >>>>>>> falsehood. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> And these are the people who are supposedly > >>>>>>> 'fact-checking' everything from your social media posts > >>>>>>> to your presidential candidates. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Who's fact-checking the fact-checkers? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> The record lows occurred near or prior to the turn of last > >>>>>> century, while the record highs are generally later. Sounds > >>>>>> like warming to me. > >>>>> > >>>>> What part of 'record-breaking' do you not understand? > >>>> > >>>> I didn't read the claims, your or theirs. > >>> > >>> Then you're not qualified to comment on this discussion. The only > >>> thing you can do is try to change the subject, which is exactly > >>> what you did. > >> > >> "Not qualified"??? > > > > Yes, if you haven't read either my claims or the newspaper's, by > > definition you don't what's being discussed here. In other words, not > > qualified. > > "Not qualified"??? Wow, congrats on your promotion to Gruppenführer! Yes, if you haven't read either my claims or the newspaper's, by definition you don't know what's being discussed here. In other words, not qualified.