Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Richard Damon Newsgroups: comp.theory Subject: Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2024 11:44:48 -0400 Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org) Message-ID: <0676eb85da3cd1319597a2923f6c9ddc915a59ca@i2pn2.org> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2024 15:44:48 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="612889"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="diqKR1lalukngNWEqoq9/uFtbkm5U+w3w6FQ0yesrXg"; User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: Bytes: 3061 Lines: 26 On 11/2/24 7:01 AM, olcott wrote: > On 11/2/2024 5:21 AM, Andy Walker wrote: >> On 02/11/2024 08:43, Mikko wrote: >>>>> A false assertion is a lie even if nobody asserts it. >> [PO:] >>>> Not at all. The base meaning of {lie} requires intentional >>>> deception. >>> That may be its base meaning but the full meaning includes >>> all false statements. The statement itself does not change >>> when someone states it so there is no clear advantage in >>> saying that the statement was not a lie until someone stated >>> it. >> >>      Disagree.  There is a clear advantage in distinguishing those >> who make [honest] mistakes from those who wilfully mislead.  We all >> make mistakes;  that, of itself, does not make us all liars.  Not only >> is there the matter of intent, there is also a need for context.  Many >> claims [esp, but not only, in science] veer from truth to falsity to >> truth again, depending on the then-current state of knowledge, or even >> the then-current state of public opinion.  It would be daft if we all >> had to qualify /everything/ we said by "I believe ..." to make it true >> even if what I believe turns out to be false. >> > > Thanks for your rationality. >