Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Richard Damon Newsgroups: comp.theory Subject: Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2024 19:21:10 -0500 Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org) Message-ID: <12b7c90f4524213b0fa08542cee044a69f38b47b@i2pn2.org> References: <6d8148432a7183c5f16c2f5b3b549fb6b3edc390@i2pn2.org> <47203deb6a279dab5cec175ebe146df4af82c672@i2pn2.org> <7ec19c29b77b7de35568e603323116f7e8dc4f48@i2pn2.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2024 00:21:10 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="983619"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="diqKR1lalukngNWEqoq9/uFtbkm5U+w3w6FQ0yesrXg"; User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 4273 Lines: 55 On 11/4/24 6:57 PM, olcott wrote: > On 11/4/2024 1:55 AM, joes wrote: >> Am Sun, 03 Nov 2024 16:34:12 -0600 schrieb olcott: >>> On 11/3/2024 4:17 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >>>> On 11/3/24 4:27 PM, olcott wrote: >>>>> On 11/3/2024 3:14 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >>>>>> On 11/3/24 1:40 PM, olcott wrote: >>>>>>> On 11/3/2024 12:22 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >>>>>>>> On 11/3/24 12:58 PM, olcott wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 11/3/2024 11:53 AM, Mike Terry wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 03/11/2024 13:19, olcott wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 11/3/2024 3:19 AM, Mikko wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2024-11-02 10:21:09 +0000, Andy Walker said: >> >>>>>>>>>>> The term "lie" is to only be applied to intentionally deceitful >>>>>>>>>>> statements. To apply the term "lie" to statements not having >>>>>>>>>>> intentional deceit itself intentional deceit. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Not if the person making that claim sincerely believes it. :) >>>>>>>>>> You are being inconsistent here... >> hehe :) >> >>>>>>>>> Richard has said that he does not mean intentional deceit when he >>>>>>>>> calls me a liar, yet uses the term "liar" anyway knowing that >>>>>>>>> others will take this to mean intentional deceit. So Richard is a >>>>>>>>> liar for calling me a liar. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Because the word doesn't just mean intential deciet. >>>>>>>> And you are an intentional liar to say it only means that, as you >>>>>>>> have been shown the definition. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Unless you always qualify you use of the term "liar" as >>>>>>> {unintentional falsity} it is the kind of defamation suit that you >>>>>>> will lose because the communication process always assumes the >>>>>>> primary meaning of a term unless otherwise specified. >>>>>> >>>>>> Nope, I guess you learned your law just as good as your logic, >>>>>> Since a "reasonable" person will undetstand that statements that are >>>>>> clearly false under the standard mean can be considered to be lies. >>>>> >>>>> *That not the way it works bro. Don't bet your house on that* >>>> >>>> Would YOU bet your savings on it? >>>> >>> Yes. I don't have much life left so yes. >> Liar. > > My cancer is getting worse. Treatment has > been postponed too long. Is that funny? > >>> *This is my official cease-and-desist notification* >>> STOP CALLING ME A LIAR !!! >> > >