Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2024 16:05:33 +0200
Organization: -
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <vgakbd$vlda$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vfli1h$fj8s$1@dont-email.me> <vflue8$3nvp8$2@i2pn2.org> <vfmd8m$k2m7$1@dont-email.me> <bcd82d9f8a987d3884220c0df7b8f7204cb9de3e@i2pn2.org> <vfmueh$mqn9$1@dont-email.me> <ff039b922cabbb6d44f90aa71a52d8c2f446b6ab@i2pn2.org> <vfo95k$11qs1$1@dont-email.me> <vfp8c0$3tobi$2@i2pn2.org> <vfpbtq$1837o$2@dont-email.me> <vfq4h9$1fo1n$1@dont-email.me> <vfqpi3$1iaob$4@dont-email.me> <vfqsng$1gikg$1@dont-email.me> <vfsadf$1urkc$1@dont-email.me> <vft4kp$23a0h$1@dont-email.me> <vfvo2o$2ln20$1@dont-email.me> <vg09p2$2kq69$1@dont-email.me> <vg0a9h$2op6r$1@dont-email.me> <fd8bf90393a5bcb10f7913da9081421637262590@i2pn2.org> <vg14nd$2t4b1$1@dont-email.me> <SGUUO.312650$kxD8.126005@fx11.iad> <vg16dl$2th77$1@dont-email.me> <vg2b6j$374jn$1@dont-email.me> <vg2gg1$37lpn$5@dont-email.me> <vg4onc$3ngof$1@dont-email.me> <vg4uem$3o3ca$1@dont-email.me> <vg7f7l$a1jf$1@dont-email.me> <vg8ulh$9stc$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2024 15:05:33 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="67dec7889df7b2c9c07f7d591ee3f979";
	logging-data="1037738"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/Y3ueKbUeMKJOqm6nVLTW2"
User-Agent: Unison/2.2
Cancel-Lock: sha1:knOwH9rmX+g6U4KINZijdGTqLq8=
Bytes: 2379

On 2024-11-03 22:49:21 +0000, Andy Walker said:

> On 03/11/2024 09:19, Mikko wrote:
>>>> [...] The statement itself does not change
>>>> when someone states it so there is no clear advantage in
>>>> saying that the statement was not a lie until someone stated
>>>> it.
>>>     Disagree.  There is a clear advantage in distinguishing those
>>> who make [honest] mistakes from those who wilfully mislead.
>> That is not a disagreement.
> 
> 	I disagree. [:-)]

Then show how two statements about distinct topics can disagree.

-- 
Mikko