Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: joes <noreply@example.org>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a
 new basis ---x86 code is a liar?
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2024 10:22:05 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <e7c5dffe4ad6a334786c977db38c0b5420697602@i2pn2.org>
References: <vfli1h$fj8s$1@dont-email.me> <vgafqv$umps$1@dont-email.me>
	<0cdb23355b23731751b9614543e8a1c257214b5a@i2pn2.org>
	<vgbskb$172co$1@dont-email.me>
	<157b13f5b452420f1bb20db458bfa7b952449ecf@i2pn2.org>
	<vgc2ju$1bqmm$1@dont-email.me>
	<585823321cf0a5e579b855438cfbf93229b233ee@i2pn2.org>
	<vgdjdq$1jr80$1@dont-email.me>
	<b24e957b9f2af15c0ba7f18a3f7bfe2c6ff6419d@i2pn2.org>
	<vgegce$1phg2$1@dont-email.me>
	<e36afcb3758e0fb26d58019c08a24c6df0b562a7@i2pn2.org>
	<vgenp1$1uh1b$2@dont-email.me>
	<acecb0ba68d86b00c95fae1ecf690ec514aee26b@i2pn2.org>
	<vgfq86$24mon$1@dont-email.me>
	<e7a092c593ad1431a1bf6589d0102312545612ef@i2pn2.org>
	<vghb16$2ge1v$1@dont-email.me>
	<e51f21daadd358ef13801c918106c2fdc65a9f6b@i2pn2.org>
	<vghe3p$2gr3p$1@dont-email.me>
	<4cb98b3918d6745f53bb19582b59e786d4af5022@i2pn2.org>
	<vghgar$2h30o$1@dont-email.me>
	<e40629600e317dba47dd3d066d83899fa7b8a7ab@i2pn2.org>
	<vgiq1d$2nkqv$1@dont-email.me>
	<c7372fcf786ecb5e394cf44079e5ff126899e252@i2pn2.org>
	<vgk26b$31qrg$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2024 10:22:05 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="1499673"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="nS1KMHaUuWOnF/ukOJzx6Ssd8y16q9UPs1GZ+I3D0CM";
User-Agent: Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a
 git.gnome.org/pan2)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 2459
Lines: 12

Am Thu, 07 Nov 2024 21:56:59 -0600 schrieb olcott:
> On 11/7/2024 9:10 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>> On 11/7/24 11:31 AM, olcott wrote:
>>>
>>> DDD emulated by HHH has the property that DDD never reaches its
>>> "return" instruction final halt state.
>> But DDD emulated by HHH isn't an objective property of DDD.
> It <is> a semantic property of that finite string pair.
Pair, and not DDD alone.

-- 
Am Sat, 20 Jul 2024 12:35:31 +0000 schrieb WM in sci.math:
It is not guaranteed that n+1 exists for every n.