Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory,comp.ai.philosophy
Subject: Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a
 new basis ---
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2024 07:26:15 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 36
Message-ID: <vft8l7$25aio$4@dont-email.me>
References: <vfli1h$fj8s$1@dont-email.me> <vflue8$3nvp8$2@i2pn2.org>
 <vfmd8m$k2m7$1@dont-email.me>
 <bcd82d9f8a987d3884220c0df7b8f7204cb9de3e@i2pn2.org>
 <vfmueh$mqn9$1@dont-email.me>
 <ff039b922cabbb6d44f90aa71a52d8c2f446b6ab@i2pn2.org>
 <vfo95k$11qs1$1@dont-email.me> <vfp8c0$3tobi$2@i2pn2.org>
 <vfpbtq$1837o$2@dont-email.me> <vfq4h9$1fo1n$1@dont-email.me>
 <vfqpi3$1iaob$4@dont-email.me> <vfqsng$1gikg$1@dont-email.me>
 <vfsadf$1urkc$1@dont-email.me> <vft4kp$23a0h$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2024 13:26:16 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="2dbd9b6f7d5f1796d3ffd574bf3f0b27";
	logging-data="2271832"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/L/v1H2P3YB/qkc0BuLCXa"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:elRp4m13R2JxG68kiOwqnCB2AW0=
X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 241030-2, 10/30/2024), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <vft4kp$23a0h$1@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 3127

On 10/30/2024 6:17 AM, Andy Walker wrote:
> On 30/10/2024 03:50, Jeff Barnett wrote:
>> You may have noticed that the moron responded to your message in
>> less than 10 minutes. Do you think he read the material before
>> responding? A good troll would have waited a few hours before
>> answering.
> 
>      I doubt whether Peter is either a moron or a troll.  Rather, as
> I have previously pointed out, he is playing "Fetch" with anyone who is
> prepared to play [which I am not, and nor are most other readers here].
> A troll would perpetrate a somewhat cranky idea and then sit back an
> watch everyone else argue to and fro without participating further, other
> than to stoke the fires occasionally.  Peter will reply instantly to
> anyone who will reply to him.  So, sadly, though less instantly, will
> several others.  I suspect they are rather lonely attention seekers,
> but as I am not a psychiatrist this is not a professional opinion.
> 

void DDD()
{
   HHH(DDD);
   return;
}

*That people fail to agree with this and also fail to*
*correctly point out any error seems to indicate dishonestly*
*or lack of technical competence*

DDD emulated by HHH according to the semantics of the x86
language cannot possibly reach its own "return" instruction
whether or not any HHH ever aborts its emulation of DDD.


-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer