Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!usenet.goja.nl.eu.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Alan Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.sys.mac.apps Subject: Re: Orphaned CodoPods are found in Apple software Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2024 12:07:53 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 25 Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sun, 07 Jul 2024 21:07:54 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="790cd3862da191afc565528a27af80b4"; logging-data="489023"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18EdUaSneL6aSajy/yK9l8L7sQonXp8H/k=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:fsnAJmSpkb7T6JOxVvwqhfL9ZPg= In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-CA Bytes: 2184 On 2024-07-07 12:06, Wolf Greenblatt wrote: > On Sun, 7 Jul 2024 07:37:29 -0400, Alan Browne wrote: > >>> Isn't Swift touted to be "safe by design" on Apple own corporate web pages? >> >> You have 0 understanding of 3rd party toolchains and 3rd party code bases. > > Probably very true. All I know is researchers found a flaw in millions of > mac/iOS apps and Apple didn't find that same flaw even after a decade. Actually, no. They found a flaw in one of the TOOLS developers USED to create millions of apps. > > Shouldn't Apple care that millions of mac/iOS apps are vulnerable? How, exactly? > > The reports say that essentially every Apple owner is affected. > So why wouldn't Apple care to do what researchers did, only 10 years ago? How would they do that?