Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: clang and gcc are not converging on constexpr
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2024 09:04:13 -0300
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 29
Message-ID: <vgkunt$36lpv$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vgj3n1$2pbqp$1@dont-email.me> <tElXO.380138$kxD8.220041@fx11.iad>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2024 13:04:14 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="03e1de9648f7edfae305f22f938daf6c";
	logging-data="3364671"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+F/10PVkTVKwpa9O86aFzDueCOGCKYTls="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:d1kkOa5UY5kj4scoH3IeusXcsPo=
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <tElXO.380138$kxD8.220041@fx11.iad>
Bytes: 1854

Em 11/8/2024 7:23 AM, Louis Krupp escreveu:
> On 11/7/2024 12:16 PM, Thiago Adams wrote:
>>
>> The differences relate to arrays. I think the standard leaves some 
>> flexibility in the specification, so there may not be a strict right 
>> or wrong - just different approaches. The challenge for creating 
>> portable code is knowing when it will work consistently across 
>> different compilers.
>>
>> Sample
>>
>> int main() {
>>     constexpr int a[] = {1, 2};
>>     static_assert(a[0] == 1);
>> }
>>
>> works in clang but not in gcc
>>
> 
> Could it be your version of gcc? The program compiles and runs with gcc 
> (GCC) 14.2.1 20240912 (Red Hat 14.2.1-3) on Fedora 40.
> 
> Louis

I was comparing against this (trunk)

https://godbolt.org/z/z88ec3K8E

-v show 15 something