Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: zen cycle Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech Subject: Re: BOLO pervert cyclist Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2024 05:23:50 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 54 Message-ID: References: <09t1ejd89utmlc4n1aah7mhphm9jha8oss@4ax.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:23:50 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="13286250979a35492f6b6dd41985b37d"; logging-data="205057"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX181EQ2fHblqzl4bwTv5fcQ5ZqA6evSSVqE=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:iqQDOx1vfZbIqvwXAcBKK8/XVDM= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: Bytes: 3606 On 9/11/2024 5:12 PM, floriduh dumbass wrote: > On Wed, 11 Sep 2024 16:35:44 -0400, Frank Krygowski > wrote: > >> On 9/11/2024 11:38 AM, Catrike Ryder wrote: >>> I offered you a risk free way to stop >>> this and you, apparently, weren't able to give up your habit of >>> attacking other people in order to try to boost your ego. >> >> Oh, bullshit. About your offer of civility, I simply said "We'll see." >> That's based on my prior experience with similar characters in the past. > > There was zero risk for you, you could've bailed out at the very first > time I failed to comply. Maybe if you led by example. > I don't believe that you're actually so > stupid not to have understood that. He's smart enough to know a dishonest little prick when he sees one. > > No, you simply couldn't bear to give up your SOP, which is to attack > and berate anyone who doesn't agree with you. Frank disagrees with Andrew on many issues. They don't resort to name calling and insults at each other. It's because you're a miserable old prick that you can't handle rational discussion or information that contradicts your contrived and ignorant statements. >> To praise them, their civility lasted at least a bit longer than yours. > > You didn't agree, therefore I had no obligation. > >>> As for my computer, what else is a person going to do in the wee hours >>> of the morning? >> >> I thought you had a wife. > > Errr, She's not my clone. She doesn't follow me around and > do whatever I do, and I wouldn't like it if she did. (IOW, I'm not > like you) Maybe your wife does that, (bless her heart) but my wife has > a life of her own. She stays up late, often reads past when I've > already gotten up. Our together time starts in the late morning when > she gets up and lasts until around eight PM when I go to bed. > > I wouldn't live with a woman wasn't as individualistic as I am. I did > that once and it didn't work out for either of us. > > -- > C'est bon > Soloman