Path: ...!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Jolly Roger Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone Subject: Re: did this group die? Date: 31 Oct 2024 00:51:55 GMT Organization: People for the Ethical Treatment of Pirates Lines: 36 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net h+3HKZpYUSHDwf3yriwC/QBfAXKuuIGG35qAF+qosWHJdl9EkU Cancel-Lock: sha1:64jfDLwb//vDpO5e6z/DhRO6z/Q= sha256:HJwMwEtI22jO+jCQrEcNRZajekG3RyEZRUhGEN0+td4= Mail-Copies-To: nobody X-Face: _.g>n!a$f3/H3jA]>9pN55*5<`}Tud57>1Y%b|b-Y~()~\t,LZ3e up1/bO{=-) User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Darwin) Bytes: 2619 On 2024-10-30, Jörg Lorenz wrote: > On 30.10.24 06:44, *Hemidactylus* wrote: >> badgolferman wrote: >>> *Hemidactylus* wrote: >>>> badgolferman wrote: >>>>> Alan wrote: >>>>>> On 2024-10-29 08:25, badgolferman wrote: >>>>>>> *Hemidactylus* wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> All I see for recent posts are from the nymshifting troll. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Do you consider someone who posts on-topic conversations as a troll? >>>>>>> Certainly Jolly Roger, Alan (2), Lorenz do. They've probably been >>>>>>> sharpening their knives the past few weeks. >>>>>> >>>>>> There's more nuance to whether or not someone is a troll than simply >>>>>> whether or not they post "on topic". >>>>> >>>>> Yes. They must be “approved” on-topic messages. >>>>> >>>> Who is the approver then, unless you’re a conspiracist? >>> >>> Never mind. I forgot who I was speaking to. >>> >> Someone who has a clue how full of shit you are. > > He is a bored old Troll. And the strongest supporter of the antisocial > figure called "Arlen". BINGO -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR