Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Rich Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers,comp.os.linux.misc Subject: Re: The joy of Typography Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2024 20:03:08 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 14 Message-ID: References: <20241017090224.000072ce@gmail.com> <20241017203051.3143245f5330ac675cc1c166@127.0.0.1> Injection-Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2024 22:03:08 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="344c4f44b9c501e2b15ec6bc1fd4e003"; logging-data="30049"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19P1vEKZZFWOHlwhrx1ek+j" User-Agent: tin/2.6.1-20211226 ("Convalmore") (Linux/5.15.139 (x86_64)) Cancel-Lock: sha1:VQLiZQYe2F7OlLrmY+geCHms8rM= Bytes: 1800 In comp.os.linux.misc 186282ud0s3 <186283@ud0s4.net> wrote: > I wonder how much CPU goes into nothing but displaying nice-looking > proportional fonts these days ? By the CPU standards of yore (i.e., MC68K or 8086/i286/i386) a significant amount. By the performance standards of just about any Intel/AMD CPU produced in about the last 20 years or so, a negligible amount. By instruction count - a lot of instructions. But reasonably modern Intel/AMD CPU's are so fast that the large count is processed really quickly.