Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: hquest@hquest.pro.br (HQuest) Newsgroups: comp.mail.sendmail Subject: Re: Forwarding problem with aliases Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2024 22:44:15 +0000 Organization: novaBBS Message-ID: <5119ca281806eece6261b4067429c54d@www.novabbs.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="3963612"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="gSdnz2tQQMpN18WMM4rt2FtJBW7lWv7DL3bXcApLdlA"; User-Agent: Rocksolid Light X-Rslight-Posting-User: 1932cd5cdfc4939182d2446462275a239b9d79e0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$F/acqTgXBpfvJgTU.Gxp2OOE.D0kULv4FOResN7rS/PSp7gSWfMaK Bytes: 1646 Lines: 12 >>>ARC will most likely result in that the big players will only accept >>>ARC from other big players, ... >> >> Could you explain what evidence you have for this? > > It is what they have done in the past and I assume this will happen in > the future. MS, Google etc. have an interest in getting more users. One > way to do that is to make incoming mail from small parties a nightmare. You suggesting RFC8617[1] will be solely ignored and/or never moved off the "Experimental" status by the Ye Ol'e Big Boys Club? [1] https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8617.html