Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Daniel70 Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho Subject: Re: [article] Doctor Who: Has the Disney Gamble Paid Off? Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2024 00:00:05 +1000 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 44 Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2024 16:00:06 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="05364ce7262da76e6a42cf571ccb8afb"; logging-data="3017083"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19MgNgFW3ONF68lF7D6sYHYmPwxOHhhTcc=" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.53.18.2 Cancel-Lock: sha1:nanUa4vYIhbzqUg2CJuGoaChAb4= In-Reply-To: Bytes: 2815 The Doctor wrote on 26/7/24 10:03 pm: > In article , Daniel70 > wrote: >> The Doctor wrote on 25/7/24 10:48 pm: >>> In article , Daniel70 >>> wrote: >>>> The Doctor wrote on 24/7/24 11:53 pm: >>>>> In article , >>>>> Hornplayer9599 wrote: >>>>>> On 7/24/2024 05:07, Daniel70 wrote: >>>>>>> The Doctor wrote on 24/7/24 12:08 am: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>>>> SO where is the original article? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Go back up-thread and YOU'LL find the link, >>>>>>> Gobble-de-gook! >>>>>> >>>>>> He can't do that. Remember, Gobble-de-gook is incapable >>>>>> of setting up his newsreader to thread posts. That's why >>>>>> he never trims his replies to only include the relevant >>>>>> text...it's the only way he can see the conversation. >>>>> >>>>> As i said, dannyboy is too lazy. >>>> >>>> I CAN'T HEAR YOU, Gobble-de-gook, so I've got ZERO idea what >>>> YOU, Gobble-de-gook, said!! >>>> >>>> And WHY does it matter if I am lazy (or NOT) when it is YOU, >>>> Gobble-de-gook, that wants to look something or other up?? >>> >>> You did not look up the original article yurself Dannyboy! >> >> Oh!! Didn't I, Gobble-de-gook?? >> >> I think I actually did, Gobble-de-gook, ABOUT A WEEK AGO, when >> Blueshirt posted the original post, Gobble-de-gook!! > > And what did it say? Don't take MY word for the content, Gobble-de-gook, look it up YOURSELF!! -- Daniel