Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: FromTheRafters Newsgroups: sci.math Subject: Re: How many different unit fractions are lessorequal than all unit fractions? (infinitary) Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2024 16:33:16 -0400 Organization: Peripheral Visions Lines: 38 Message-ID: References: <8ce3fac3a0c92d85c72fec966d424548baebe5af@i2pn2.org> <55cbb075e2f793e3c52f55af73c82c61d2ce8d44@i2pn2.org> <4bc3b086-247a-4547-89cc-1d47f502659d@tha.de> <0f95c2ba186e7c007b2e947aad0e3f4d6177e196@i2pn2.org> Reply-To: erratic.howard@gmail.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2024 22:33:22 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="183e3fa38b53451b283b297c8ebb227e"; logging-data="2441335"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18Pxsb62ghwx++Jxh+qQ7IFEaUicz5n9NY=" Cancel-Lock: sha1:4MbF7UgBOLL63fMbNPEUZXfjgQI= X-ICQ: 1701145376 X-Newsreader: MesNews/1.08.06.00-gb Bytes: 3600 joes explained on 10/8/2024 : > Am Tue, 08 Oct 2024 17:26:43 +0200 schrieb WM: >> On 08.10.2024 15:24, joes wrote: >>> Am Tue, 08 Oct 2024 12:51:03 +0200 schrieb WM: >>>> On 07.10.2024 17:18, joes wrote: >>>>> Am Mon, 07 Oct 2024 11:08:33 +0200 schrieb WM: >>>>>> On 07.10.2024 10:05, joes wrote: >>>>>>> Am Mon, 07 Oct 2024 09:41:23 +0200 schrieb WM: >>>>>>>> On 06.10.2024 17:48, Alan Mackenzie wrote: >>>>>>>> even an unbounded sequence does not get longer when shifted by one >>>>>>>> step. >>>>>>> Nor does it get shorter, it stays infinite. >>>>>> It keeps all its elements but not more. >>>>> „More” being a different kind of infinity, namely at least >>>>> uncountable. >>>> Nonsense. >>> Only according to your broken concept of cardinality, by which N u {a} >>> is „bigger” than N, and N\{1} u {a} can’t even be compared. > Clearly they are the same „size”. > >>>>> All ω+k are equally infinite. >>>> Nonsense. > This is your useless replacement of cardinality. > >>>>>>> Of course stopping after a finite number, which potential infinity >>>>>>> seems to mean, is not „complete” in that sense. Hilbert’s Hotel is >>>>>>> actually infinite, it already holds infinite guests. >>>>>> Name them by all the natural numbers. Then no further guest can >>>>>> appear. >>>>> It can, if I begin numbering with 2. The cardinality of N\{1} can’t >>>>> be finite. >>>> Cardinality is nonsense. >>> Isn’t N\{1} finite? It has ω-1 elements. >> But after the visble natural numbers the dark domain comes, and that is >> what prevents to see the end (which is dark too). > But ω-1 is a finite natural. No, that is like saying zero minus one is a natural number.