Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de>
Newsgroups: sci.logic
Subject: Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers
 (extra-ordinary)
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2024 14:59:24 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <vgvmvr$1kc5f$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vg7cp8$9jka$1@dont-email.me>
 <0e67005f-120e-4b3b-a4d2-ec4bbc1c5662@att.net> <vga5mb$st52$1@dont-email.me>
 <vga7qi$talf$1@dont-email.me> <03b90d6c-fff1-411d-9dec-1c5cc7058480@tha.de>
 <vgb1fj$128tl$1@dont-email.me> <vgb2r6$11df6$3@dont-email.me>
 <vgcs35$1fq8n$1@dont-email.me> <vgfepg$22hhn$1@dont-email.me>
 <vgg0ic$25pcn$1@dont-email.me> <vggai3$25spe$8@dont-email.me>
 <vgi0t7$2ji2i$1@dont-email.me> <vgiet5$2l5ni$1@dont-email.me>
 <vgl2hj$3794c$1@dont-email.me> <vgleau$bi0i$2@solani.org>
 <vgnq3i$3qgfe$1@dont-email.me> <vgoka6$3vg2p$1@dont-email.me>
 <vgq1cm$b5vj$1@dont-email.me> <vgq3ca$beif$1@dont-email.me>
 <vgsp1c$v1ss$1@dont-email.me> <vgsq2v$v5t1$1@dont-email.me>
 <vgvm6h$1k8co$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2024 14:59:24 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="58c87137bb70e24653c8534960defd84";
	logging-data="1716399"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18d5GI6TKB/IszL43Ek8SjqeaLBpAqcz5U="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:w39fUljl8H8U4EBQRgYf8REjsA0=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <vgvm6h$1k8co$1@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 2312

On 12.11.2024 14:45, Mikko wrote:
> On 2024-11-11 11:33:52 +0000, WM said:

>>> Between the intervals J(n) and (Jn+1) there are infinitely many rational
>>> and irrational numbers but no hatural numbers.
> 
>> Therefore infinitely many natural numbers must become centres of 
>> intervals, if Cantor was right. But that is impossible.
> 
> Where did Cantor say otherwise?

Cantor said that all rationals are within the sequence and hence within 
all intervals. I prove that rationals are in the complement.

Regards, WM