Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Mikko Newsgroups: comp.theory Subject: Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2024 12:08:52 +0200 Organization: - Lines: 44 Message-ID: References: <907b6e45c74720036b5f42c503d76ac426a71c92@i2pn2.org> <622e5aa555a9941d4cdb292d1e3e54e687e7b547@i2pn2.org> <254d3e7be0462ba8225ec0eb4804941ea635770d@i2pn2.org> <351e96d26f38fdb708f7856b3f19aef63bfb29a9@i2pn2.org> <8df0b30e5c51141a4866119e6fa2fc69597bd938@i2pn2.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2024 11:08:52 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="13fd1e3c9cf2c388ad20111da77f0ae9"; logging-data="1887128"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+AlgCO56YLa9pn79PRq8/C" User-Agent: Unison/2.2 Cancel-Lock: sha1:QCC7YrCXA3ZN187djPhfTPw/+vw= Bytes: 2952 On 2024-11-19 01:32:16 +0000, Richard Damon said: > On 11/18/24 6:08 PM, olcott wrote: >> On 11/18/2024 3:36 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >>> On 11/18/24 3:44 PM, olcott wrote: >>>> On 11/18/2024 3:53 AM, Mikko wrote: >>>>> On 2024-11-18 04:04:39 +0000, olcott said: >>>>> >>>>>> You stupidly claimed termination analysis is only done >>>>>> on programs. I proved that you were stupidly wrong on >>>>>> pages 24-27 of the PDF of this paper. >>>>>> >>>>>> Automated Termination Analysis of C Programs >>>>>> https://publications.rwth-aachen.de/record/972440/files/972440.pdf >>>>> >>>>> The claim is not supported by the referred article. >>>>> >>>> >>>> You are a damned liar. Page 24 proves that termination >>>> analysis is performed on C functions. It is damned liars >>>> like you that are causing the rise of the fourth reich. >>>> >>> >>> LEAF C functions. >>> >> >> You can't retroactively change your original claim >> to make it look like you never made a mistake. >> That is what damned liars do. > > I didn't. > > You are just lying. > > Your problem is you don't know what you are talking about and just > bring up phases you didn't learn but read by just rote. I think that another problem is more serious: he dosn't know what other people talk about but thinks he does and therefore fails the avoid the sin of lying about other people. -- Mikko