Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Chris Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone Subject: Re: green bubble syndrome Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2024 19:11:15 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 13 Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2024 21:11:15 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="51e1a8141ffad3a6ee79e0ba86ab2820"; logging-data="3974032"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19xnMj3w1X/SGXxcmJi1Wn56Kf0vutkh78=" User-Agent: NewsTap/5.5 (iPhone/iPod Touch) Cancel-Lock: sha1:9dy48pYU+wSYVHDW8tIvZg/5RTI= sha1:+NqKmBjUtPR07ESo2id9c++4k0Y= Bytes: 1725 Wilf wrote: > On 10/10/2024 at 17:28, Jolly Roger wrote: >> Apple sold 2.5 BILLION iPhones (as of 2023, so not counting 2024), and >> you are trying to tell us that a survey of 1000 people is significant? >> Quick question: How many times do you think 1000 goes into 2.5 billion? > > If the sample is chosen properly (and that's the critical part), results > from a small but representative sample of the whole population can be > statistically significant. So just because someone has no background in > statistics is a not a reason to necessarily doubt the premise. Correct.