Path: ...!news.roellig-ltd.de!open-news-network.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Jolly Roger Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone Subject: Re: green bubble syndrome Date: 12 Oct 2024 00:53:50 GMT Organization: People for the Ethical Treatment of Pirates Lines: 22 Message-ID: References: X-Trace: individual.net 6AZLPTd1OC6cbMFaA1HCLQ7QJVqK2gDaj1RdifR4CBE6MFrr5i Cancel-Lock: sha1:DL8jMhQ+PD7WXBqpiIA9HBb7ahI= sha256:XsiRe5SPRtIuyMfKzfqn+09tQxKXlNDaTaNOnFFBQV0= Mail-Copies-To: nobody X-Face: _.g>n!a$f3/H3jA]>9pN55*5<`}Tud57>1Y%b|b-Y~()~\t,LZ3e up1/bO{=-) User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Darwin) Bytes: 2040 On 2024-10-11, Alan Browne wrote: > On 2024-10-11 05:51, Wilf wrote: >> On 10/10/2024 at 17:28, Jolly Roger wrote: >>> Apple sold 2.5 BILLION iPhones (as of 2023, so not counting 2024), >>> and you are trying to tell us that a survey of 1000 people is >>> significant? Quick question: How many times do you think 1000 goes >>> into 2.5 billion? >> >> If the sample is chosen properly (and that's the critical part), >> results from a small but representative sample of the whole >> population can be statistically significant. > > Do you have evidence that the sample pop was chosen properly? He does not. If that were known, we wouldn't be having this conversation. -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR