Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Chris M. Thomasson" Newsgroups: sci.math Subject: Re: 2N=E Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2024 01:31:14 -0800 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 32 Message-ID: References: <40b398d1-40c5-45e9-8615-1cf437af0185@att.net> <3537899e-e951-4138-b56c-fc76340762b8@att.net> <8b31df46-1361-4dd1-aed3-1f42039af960@att.net> <84c1bb5d-67db-4d21-918a-f86cd1f815c5@att.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2024 10:31:15 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="a3560c29bf30eac6bd9d64bfc512bec5"; logging-data="940200"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+z17ITxbYo8r5LCW7BZ8+EnlmW9PHGePU=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:g708zfspeXV68G3GhJyODBKqbH8= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: Bytes: 2828 On 11/4/2024 1:30 AM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: > On 11/4/2024 12:40 AM, FromTheRafters wrote: >> Chris M. Thomasson laid this down on his screen : >>> On 11/3/2024 3:56 AM, WM wrote: >>>> On 03.11.2024 09:50, joes wrote: >>>>> pparently you do think that there is a >>>>> natural n such that 2^n is infinite. >>>> >>>> If all naturals are there, then no further one is available. >>> >>> Sigh. There are infinite natural numbers, there is no last largest one. >> >> No, natural numbers are finite. The set of all of the natural numbers >> is infinite. > > Yeah. I meant they are with end aka no largest natural exists yet every Without end! God damn typos! Ahhh fuck! Sorry. ;^/ > > any_natural + 1 = another_natural > > Why does WM seem to think that this might hold: > > > any_natural + 1 = can_equal_a_strange_weirdo_dark_number_thing? > > > > > [...]