Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: FromTheRafters Newsgroups: sci.math Subject: Re: How many different unit fractions are lessorequal than all unit fractions? (infinitary) Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2024 06:02:27 -0400 Organization: Peripheral Visions Lines: 42 Message-ID: References: <276fc9df-619b-4a10-b414-a04a74aa7378@att.net> <88e6a631-417a-4dd0-9443-a57116dcbd28@att.net> <7a1e34df-ffee-4d30-ae8c-2af5bcb1d932@att.net> <6a90a2e2-a4fa-4a8d-83e9-2e451fa8dd51@att.net> <0e5fb47d-60f7-42bb-beec-4a9661c807da@tha.de> Reply-To: erratic.howard@gmail.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2024 11:02:31 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f2e93e9ceba9b38137f2d88d53fdbdd8"; logging-data="1600455"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19xqU8spXS67ViRqvVD1UrWOx1CH5KXjW0=" Cancel-Lock: sha1:w8XuZRW8m+bMTujAkQmhoFX8urs= X-ICQ: 1701145376 X-Newsreader: MesNews/1.08.06.00-gb Bytes: 3334 WM formulated the question : > On 28.10.2024 21:51, FromTheRafters wrote: >> WM explained : >>> On 28.10.2024 15:07, FromTheRafters wrote: >>>> WM was thinking very hard : >>> >>>>> The function NUF(x) = Number of Unit Fractions between 0 and x starts >>>>> with 0 at 0. >>>> >>>> Followed by a discontinuity. >>> >>> No. ∀n ∈ ℕ: 1/n - 1/(n+1) > 0 holds everywhere. >> >> Not for n equal to zero. > > I said ∀n ∈ ℕ. 0 is no natural number. NUF(0) = 0. That is why your function is a step function with a discontinuity. >>>>> After NUF(x') = 1 it cannot change to NUF(x'') =  2 without pausing for >>>>> an interval consisting of uncountably many real points. >>>> >>>> Your "Axiom of because I say so" is overworked. >>> >>> It is mathematics:>> The reason is this: ∀n ∈ ℕ: 1/n - 1/(n+1) > 0. >>>> >>>> Non sequitur. This is just the second part of your stepwise function. >>> >>> It holds everywhere if mathematics holds everywhere. >>> >>>> It doesn't have to happen step by step as you envision it. >>> >>> As mathematics dictates it. >>> >>> You have confessed: In order to maintain actual infinity without dark >>> numbers, you have to violate mathematics. >> >> Bull! Just another of your non sequiturs. > > Try to argue mathematically in spite of spitting nonsense or be quiet. I am, you just have trouble following along.