Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: WM Newsgroups: sci.math Subject: Re: 2N=E Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2024 12:28:44 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 13 Message-ID: References: <40b398d1-40c5-45e9-8615-1cf437af0185@att.net> <3537899e-e951-4138-b56c-fc76340762b8@att.net> <8b31df46-1361-4dd1-aed3-1f42039af960@att.net> <84c1bb5d-67db-4d21-918a-f86cd1f815c5@att.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2024 12:28:44 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="10c225c131b9f83ecf8835aacca35945"; logging-data="950406"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18RPdSSu6RlrHy57UYFm/jspTuVaY+gfdo=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:P1DSe7WvF5Yt2wAoBTO5zuGZYdg= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: Bytes: 2276 On 03.11.2024 23:40, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: > On 11/3/2024 3:56 AM, WM wrote: >> If all naturals are there, then no further one is available. > > Sigh. There are infinite natural numbers, there is no last largest one. > > Why can't you get this! Because Cantor applies all with no exception for enumerating purposes. Regards, WM