Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: hertz778@gmail.com (rhertz) Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: Want to prove =?UTF-8?B?RT1tY8KyPyBVbml2ZXJzaXR5IGxhYnMgc2hvdWxkIHRy?= =?UTF-8?B?eSB0aGlzIQ==?= Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2024 04:50:51 +0000 Organization: novaBBS Message-ID: References: <9687d391072c6f5d19d3e4cad9e944ba@www.novabbs.com> <01685fa9d16c8f15a4b8fd63f5b42ed2@www.novabbs.com> <3cccb55b7c7c451a385b8aad5aac6516@www.novabbs.com> <98a0a1fbdc93a5fcc108882d99718764@www.novabbs.com> <141e19a1c6acd54116739058391ca9f8@www.novabbs.com> <45ed9424edce8c13db24c1dbb8752c26@www.novabbs.com> <8R50P.41756$1efb.23364@fx08.ams4> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="3729983"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="OjDMvaaXMeeN/7kNOPQl+dWI+zbnIp3mGAHMVhZ2e/A"; User-Agent: Rocksolid Light X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 X-Rslight-Posting-User: 26080b4f8b9f153eb24ebbc1b47c4c36ee247939 X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$Urj1cdTRW84oo7d3rG1B.uDb0.k.q.2srEqWn46GpbyKk47hpQzNC Bytes: 6293 Lines: 118 On Sat, 23 Nov 2024 1:34:45 +0000, Ross Finlayson wrote: > On 11/22/2024 01:03 PM, rhertz wrote: >> On Fri, 22 Nov 2024 20:30:39 +0000, Paul B. Andersen wrote: >> >> >> >> >>> Bottom line: >>> It doesn't matter how you put energy into a closed cavity. >>> In the cavity there will be a black body radiation with >>> temperature equal to the temperature of the walls. >>> >>> The reflectivity, albedo or colour of the inner surface >>> of the cavity are irrelevant. The radiation in the cavity >>> will always be black body radiation. >>> >>> Make a hole in your cavity, and you have a perfect >>> black body radiation source. >>> >>> Its temperature will not be very high, though- >>> >>>> >>>> Now smile, asshole. >>> >>> :-D >> >> It is not a BB radiation source! >> >> You ignored the fact that the heat goes away from the cavity. It doesn't >> remain neither inside nor outside. It's eliminated by cooling >> mechanisms, as I wrote as an initial condition. Read all the posts. >> >> There is no light energy left within the cavity, nor heat energy outside >> it. You better think again about it. >> >> You also ignored my post apologizing to all people that participated in >> this thread. That makes you a bigger ASSHOLE than what I thought. >> >> Now, start thinking in my NEXT IDEA: >> >> Willing to try to prove/disprove E=mc² at a macroscopic level, I'll >> think of an experiment that incorporates electromagnetic oscillations >> passing through the cavity, which will be converted in a CAPACITOR, by >> cutting it in halves and isolating them with a thin ring. >> >> What I propose to MEASURE is the changes in the frequency of the LC >> oscillator, within a time window of about 3 msec, which repeats >> permanently. >> >> I'll use a relationship between mass and capacitance for the cavity, >> with frequency around 1 Mhz or greater. >> >> >> It was a failed idea for an experiment, but there are OTHER WAYS to >> check E=mc² at a macroscopic level, without resorting to nuclear energy >> crap (Kg evaporated vs. energy provided), or else. >> >> Ask ChatGPT: >> >> >> any other non-relativistic means to prove E=mc^2? >> or >> Is there any way to prove E=mc^2 at higher level than quantum? >> or >> can I use electrostatic energy? >> >> >> The last one gave interesting insights. Ask to it sequentially the above >> lines. >> >> >> >> Keep smiling, asshole. > > > In more civil times we'd just say, "see you later, alligator", > then the other fellow would say, "in a while, crocodile". > > Swearing was considered something trash did, > or perhaps someone who just stubbed themselves. > > Toss your prayer-booth this "super-imposed neutral linac > and charged cyclotron, measuring while switching on > and off, each" and see what results. Here if I posed it > to the large language model, then I'd also prompt it > reasons what to provide the configuration and energy > of experiment, and have here a book detailing the > principles of construction. > > This is where Einstein's second-mass famous mass-energy > equivalence derivation arrives at this from fundamentally > different principles for the nominally (at least) non-linear > and furthermore the formally rotating, setting. > > And some people even dare to think that "infinity" > isn't a natural unit, .... We live in harsh times and victorian language has lost any meaning. You should know a bit more about Argentina and the current far right president, who has a viper and dirty tongue every fucking day, attacking the opposition. He's grooming a "praetorian guard" of young followers, who insult everyone, every day through social media and streaming. Sometimes calling asshole to an asshole has more scientific meaning than E=mc2. And Paul enters into this category. He's unable to accept any mistake and, if he takes any offense, disappear for a while, expecting that his assholeness be forgotten. He has some traits like the infamous Dono, who changed what you wrote and pretend it's done by you. Also, he lied and distorted writings many times to get going with his agenda. Many times I write, on purpose, calculations and wait for him to take the bait. I smile thinking how much I make him work with details, because it's the way he is. He can't accept that I'm trolling him. It's like going to fish. Requires patience, but finally he will bite.