Path: ...!npeer.as286.net!npeer-ng0.as286.net!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!newsfeed.xs3.de!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!news.eyrie.org!jik4.kamens.us!ngp.big-8.org!robomod!not-for-mail
X-NGP-Policy: http://www.big-8.org/~ngp
X-NGP-Info-1: Send submissions to ngp@ngp.big-8.org
X-NGP-Info-2: Send technical complaints to ngp-admin@ngp.big-8.org
X-NGP-Info-3: Send complaints about policy to ngp-board@ngp.big-8.org
X-Comment: Moderators do not necessarily agree or disagree with this article.
X-Robomod: STUMP
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2024 19:16:58 CST
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 jik4.kamens.us 49UGi65N1148300
Delivered-To: news-groups-proposals@moderators.isc.org
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mod-relay.zaccari.net 2F15161115
Authentication-Results: name/501775F709; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=dorfdsl.de
From: Marco Moock
Newsgroups: news.groups.proposals
Subject: Re: Moderator Vacancy Investigation: comp.os.plan9
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID:
References:
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2024 17:44:03 +0100 (CET)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:C5iz88kCiJsPwnItcvqALYBvat8=
X-Auth-Sender: U2FsdGVkX1/torBG64TNUOhTeHotrNtCg94+u5UhCKY=
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.8 required=5.0
tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED,
SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_IN_WELCOMELIST,USER_IN_WHITELIST
autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on
smtp.eternal-september.org
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1
Approved: NGP Approval Key
X-Approval-Mod: tmiller
Lines: 26
X-Auth: PGPMoose V1.1 PGP news.groups.proposals
iH0EABECAD0WIQSH6so/GGyIEkxgFjWs+RBu6T2F2wUCZyK+ah8cbmdwLWFwcHJv
dmFsLWtleUBuZ3AuYmlnLTgub3JnAAoJEKz5EG7pPYXbygMAn3a5Mb+VOSrmFjZ9
i2ts/x8l01hUAJ9a21oPS63K3gBXPm3PlurSwI3AvQ==
=2Usz
Bytes: 3036
On 29.10.2024 um 17:08 Uhr morena wrote:
> In this case, nobody has a moral 'right' to be the owner - moderator
> of this newsgroup, and it should become *unmoderated*.
Technically that means it will be deleted and a new one without
moderation will be created.
> I don't see a reason for the removal of the newsgroup based on the
> current state of Usenet. It's full of dead newsgroups and junkyards.
Such stuff should be removed to make it easier for people to find
places where discussion occurs. That's why the board discusses this.
> If just few people are still interested in this newsgroup, it should
> stay alive.
That's the question.
Can somebody ask at the place where the plan 9 people currently discuss
if there is interest?
--
kind regards
Marco
Send spam to 1730218080muell@cartoonies.org