Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: tomyee3@gmail.com (ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog) Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: Relativity Refuted by Elementary Logic Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2024 13:03:31 +0000 Organization: novaBBS Message-ID: References: <27cf5f58333a92a17fb129caf2cafdd7@www.novabbs.com> <25a0d003c5b33a49f03e0abeecfc94a2@www.novabbs.com> <6735279b$0$12947$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <5a6d4aafdc6bef1e4410c8c306aa09ac@www.novabbs.com> <6735d63c$1$16832$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <42079e861a831c1258353bda7f9b7772@www.novabbs.com> <67367037$0$28073$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <673713f3$0$28068$426a74cc@news.free.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="2578519"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="Ooch2ht+q3xfrepY75FKkEEx2SPWDQTvfft66HacveI"; User-Agent: Rocksolid Light X-Rslight-Posting-User: 504a4e36a1e6a0679da537f565a179f60d7acbd8 X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$OqTe5/Wp.lUC5IcFUCd4r.UYEggSbX14lhgWLyUaJ9cF3sElH0UsO X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 Bytes: 2657 Lines: 28 On Fri, 15 Nov 2024 9:27:15 +0000, J. J. Lodder wrote: > Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote: > >> On 2024-11-14 21:48:39 +0000, J. J. Lodder said: >> >>> LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote: >>> >>>> Jan: An inconsistent theory does not predict. Relativity is an ideology, >>>> so you are ironically projecting your faults onto others. Then you don't >>>> know what you are defending because you can't tell me what it predicts. >>> >>> No quoted text, no reply, >> >> Not even an indication of which Jan he is referring to. Can he not know >> that we have two sane people of that name here? > > Yes. The LCC entity often picks up some trigger word to go of on a rant > of its own, with little or no relation to the input. > > It would be best if we all stopped replying to such postings. > This is just a plainly wrong idea of usenet posting, so abuse, I prefer responding to those of us who evidently "once upon a time" were bright, highly accomplished individuals, but who in their retirement years have become consumed by an obsession against SR and/or Einstein. In a quarter century of visiting these newsgroups, I have actually witnessed a single fringe poster make his way back to sanity. It is my hope to witness such a phenomenon again.