Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Chris Townley <news@cct-net.co.uk>
Newsgroups: comp.os.vms
Subject: Re: New VSI blog post
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2024 02:29:18 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 35
Message-ID: <v8eodf$1iu9h$3@dont-email.me>
References: <v899gl$mggt$1@dont-email.me>
 <b198efec-c9f0-4742-9d56-c2ff08478666@cropcircledogs.com>
 <f937eda568d2d583d99e41089f42db195aba58d7@i2pn2.org>
 <v8efb9$1iu9h$2@dont-email.me> <v8em4q$1qtbp$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2024 03:29:19 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="cc43303d30ddbee38c17ca739c3765ff";
	logging-data="1669425"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+4B/Hvjbnohl0X/nWmQk0KkH4xrpyp3zg="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:5vSAammgSYHeYKiPKFo9BETZvMQ=
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <v8em4q$1qtbp$1@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 2358

On 01/08/2024 01:50, Craig A. Berry wrote:
> On 7/31/24 5:54 PM, Chris Townley wrote:
>> On 31/07/2024 21:50, John Reagan wrote:
> 
> 
>>> The x86 BASIC compiler is finished and will be available on the 
>>> portal in the next day or so (for those who have access)
>>>
>>> $ show sys/noproc
>>> OpenVMS V9.2-2  on node X86VMS   31-JUL-2024 16:48:23.70   Uptime  7 
>>> 03:53:46
>>> $ basic/version
>>> VSI BASIC x86-64 V1.9-001 (GEM 50Y7I) on OpenVMS x86_64 V9.2-2
>>>
>>> $ show sys/noproc
>>> OpenVMS E9.2-3  on node X86VMS   31-JUL-2024 16:48:32.66   Uptime  14 
>>> 03:18:17
>>> $ basic/version
>>> VSI BASIC x86-64 V1.9-001 (GEM 50Y7I) on OpenVMS x86_64 E9.2-3
>>>
>>
>> Do we need 9.2-3, or is 9.2-2 enough?
>> I do know I need to recompile everything
> 
> Based on a recent forum thread that I think you were in, you need 9.2-2
> with the new compiler installed or 9.2-3.  You can't run images built
> with the new compiler on stock 9.2-2.  If enough people complain, there
> could be an RTL kit for 9.2-2, but why?  Just upgrade to 9.2-3.
> 

But the new Basic is there, but no 9.2-3 as far as I can see

-- 
Chris