Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Newsgroups: sci.electronics.repair Subject: Re: Solder selection for general repair work Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2024 16:57:53 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 13 Message-ID: References: <8ca3c325-484e-9361-5132-4b1d27e50f46@electrooptical.net> Injection-Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2024 17:57:53 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="53b8de9ea921bef151cddbada3ac601c"; logging-data="764846"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+9MzJoduCn9ccoaN4PEdkmRIbSoQiQIX8=" User-Agent: tin/2.6.2-20221225 ("Pittyvaich") (FreeBSD/14.1-RELEASE-p5 (arm64)) Cancel-Lock: sha1:mA0QgFbzklNAttklOEahWbg4lqU= Bytes: 1423 Phil Hobbs wrote: > > You can still get good ol' Kester 44. It has RA flux, the more active > version of the usual tree sap stuff, which is helpful when using old > components. Is there any electrical or mechanical advantage to be had among the more modern formulations? Thanks for writing! bob prohaska