Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: john larkin Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design Subject: Re: Datasheet-flation? Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2024 07:21:58 -0800 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 35 Message-ID: References: <6vf4kjtqtmhcpab43duk2u7usunavpjaj6@4ax.com> <4qtg1lx7ms.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> <422i1lxd1l.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2024 16:22:01 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="91f6c56077a3bd8c399c29b307a15535"; logging-data="1207394"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+ApCTQ7gUFNCnXoHraxK/q" User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272 Cancel-Lock: sha1:/MTBv8Ugqy8P9mB/21z2znXJnt0= Bytes: 2516 On Thu, 28 Nov 2024 20:42:59 -0700, Don Y wrote: >On 11/28/2024 6:49 AM, Carlos E.R. wrote: >>> Do *you* "write for yourself" or "write for others"? >>> >>> I.e., do you write assuming YOU are the Reader?  Or, that >>> OTHERS will be the Reader? >>> >>> [There seems to be a split on how developers write; I think >>> this would affect their choice of (spoken) languages as well.] >> >> Ah. If I write a script I tend to mix English and Spanish. I tend to use >> English thinking of sharing the script or asking questions about it. The places >> where I do that are English speaking mostly. > >I always write for others -- as, if I have to revisit the code >a year or five hence, *I* will effectively BE one of those >"others". Some guy wrote a c program that strips comments from c programs. His reasoning is that the code speaks for itself, and the comments are always wrong. I assume that program was not commented. I saw a bit of actual Windows source code, and it had a mandatory, standard comment section at the start of any block of code. It said */ Author: Jim Smith Date: 2018 Purpose: what it says /*