Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Python <python@invalid.org>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Why relativity is a pseudoscience? First approach.
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2024 02:50:23 +0200
Organization: CCCP
Lines: 56
Message-ID: <vbqpgf$347cs$20@dont-email.me>
References: <d8b52c0ad27618036611e0704e58e607@www.novabbs.com>
 <vbp5j0$2taov$1@dont-email.me>
 <dad1eb8634e36c05d20669465aa5a1b2@www.novabbs.com>
 <572db43d3ebd42800ac6941266f53931@www.novabbs.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2024 02:50:24 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="bad0efb51fa3f5a837496519ffdb3988";
	logging-data="3284380"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/7wOzcdi8LnjmeNLkl0Aqo"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:mZBINWeDKgBFY6DDytgMS1/lot0=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <572db43d3ebd42800ac6941266f53931@www.novabbs.com>
Bytes: 3562

Le 11/09/2024 à 02:35, rhertz a écrit :
> More additions to my OP about the pseudoscience that relativity is.
> 
> Remember MASS INCREASE due to inertial velocity v>0?
> 
> This one is also INDIGNANT and SHAMEFUL.
> 
> In the 1905 paper (§ 10. Dynamics of the Slowly Accelerated Electron),
> Einstein violated any concept of relativity when he MERGED BOTH
> REFERENCE FRAMES INTO ONE, to obtain his incredible assertion that mass
> of one electron increased with velocity v.
> 
> This DIABOLIC LIE was supported increasingly over the next 90 YEARS,
> till mid 1990s, when the relativistic community started to ABANDON THIS
> IDEA (90 years of idiocy and counting). Thanks to the relentless work of
> prestigious relativists (like the Russian Okun), MOST OF THE COMMUNITY
> switched to the concept of increase of kinetic energy, accepting that
> MASS is INVARIABLE.
> 
> So, instead of thinking AND USING for 90 years the concept of mass
> increase under inertial motion:
> 
> M = Mo/√(1 - v²/c²)
> 
> relativists switched (the majority of them, EVEN TODAY) to this
> expression of KE increase:
> 
> 
> KE = (1/√(1 - v²/c²) - 1) Mo, which doesn't include THE FAKE VALUE Mo of
> any mass at (relative) rest.
> 
> This was done, and still is done, WHILE THERE IS NOT A SINGLE IDEA ABOUT
> WHAT MASS IS. Even less in 1905,
> when Einstein plagiarized Poincaré by using TWO MASSES FOR AN ELECTRON:
> Longitudinal and transversal masses.
> 
> I don't know what moral stature and lack of intellectual integrity had
> MANY GENERATIONS OF PHYSICISTS to support this STUPID IDEA FOR ALMOST A
> CENTURY.
> 
> DEGENERACY OF THOUGHT AND GENERALIZED INTELLECTUAL CORRUPTION OF THOSE
> WHO WANTED TO KEEP BELONGING TO THE RELATIVISTIC HERD (ANYTHING FOR A
> JOB, MONEY AND PRIVILEGES), BUT THESE CONFLICTS LED DIRECTLY TO THE
> DEATH OF PHYSICS AS AN HONORABLE SCIENCE.
> 
> Today, physics (almost on the entire of branches using relativity) is
> rejected by the technological world, which is replacing it as a science
> of value. Relativity has found shelter on two or three USELESS BRANCHES,
> like particle physics, cosmology and astrophysics, which DON'T PROVIDE A
> SINGLE THING OF VALUE TO THE SOCIETY AND REAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
> SINCE MID 1960s.
> 
> Shame on PSEUDOSCIENTISTS. They don't have a single ounce of moral and
> integrity.

yawn