Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connectionsPath: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: morena Newsgroups: news.groups Subject: Re: 2nd RFD: Remove rec.arts.comics.reviews and rec.arts.comics.info Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2024 20:58:24 +0100 Organization: God's garden Lines: 34 Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2024 20:58:25 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="280abec047fd980959546febb7517c22"; logging-data="2678801"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19Vbj3WfDypAFhhEz0J3JC0" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:dbdVD60ZvwPSpNnw4sO8YZf8E6I= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: Bytes: 2588 On 12/6/24 20:28, Adam H. Kerman wrote: > I'll decide where to post a followup, thank you very much. I refuse to > post in news.groups.proposals. Gee, the hierarchy administrators sure > don't see irony in directing discussion to a moderated newsgroup > designed to thwart discussion (criticsm of the past hierarchy > administrators for being trolled into the discussions of the socmen > herding group and pondscum group, both absurd proposals for moderated > newsgroups discussion of which wouldn't die out for months) to discuss > the failure of the moderation scheme for these two newsgroups. > Another time when skirv wanted to withdraw as a group moderator (I > forget which group), he posted an MVI, which was an abuse of process. > > This is all irrelevant. What needs to be done, which would be hard but > useful work, is to contact each and every currently used moderated > newsgroup to verify that they have a moderation team in place and a > moderator succession policy. > > Are you going to do that? No, of course not, 'cuz that might ensure that > these might be useable for the indefinite future. > > Leave all the failed moderated newsgroups in the checkgroups to remind > the Usenet community of the folly of the current moderation scheme with > its single point of (inevitable) failure. > > As always, cleaning up checkgroups doesn't save Usenet. It's busy work. People are with you! We stand with you. All peasant are willing to take flags and move to the square. -- morena http://morena.rip gopher://morena.rip