Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de>
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers
 (extra-ordinary)
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2024 14:04:09 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <vj6psc$dp01$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vg7cp8$9jka$1@dont-email.me> <vikg6c$3c4tu$1@dont-email.me>
 <9bcc128b-dea8-4397-9963-45c93d1c14c7@att.net> <vimvgd$3vv5r$9@dont-email.me>
 <50c82b03-8aa1-492c-9af3-4cf2673d6516@att.net> <vip5mo$p0da$1@dont-email.me>
 <vipb6l$qfig$1@dont-email.me> <viplj0$t1f8$1@dont-email.me>
 <5a122d22-2b21-4d65-9f5b-4f226eebf9d4@att.net> <viq3i2$105iq$1@dont-email.me>
 <e055ec41-a98d-4917-802f-169575a5b556@att.net> <virq3t$1gs07$1@dont-email.me>
 <c8faf784-348a-42e9-a784-b2337f4e8160@att.net>
 <3af23566-0dfc-4001-b19b-96e5d4110fee@tha.de>
 <ae606e53-0ded-4101-9685-fa33c9a35cb9@att.net> <viuc2a$27gm1$1@dont-email.me>
 <8a53c5d4-4afd-4f25-b1da-30d57e7fe91c@att.net> <vj1acu$31atn$3@dont-email.me>
 <ec451cd6-16ba-463d-8658-8588093e1696@att.net> <vj2f61$3b1no$1@dont-email.me>
 <10ebeeea-6712-4544-870b-92803ee1e398@att.net> <vj3tl0$3nktg$2@dont-email.me>
 <1f1a4089-dfeb-45f8-9c48-a36f6a4688fb@att.net> <vj6bqo$b6bt$1@dont-email.me>
 <b09445be167b757878741be04c87cf76d24d9786@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2024 14:04:13 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="494cdfa528696f2d5423ae7fa961822f";
	logging-data="451585"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18E8+SEheESTDJKENRKH/ZrXw0dt+6oGEk="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:FKJxdFGkyozQgH1pcv94S7FTEn8=
In-Reply-To: <b09445be167b757878741be04c87cf76d24d9786@i2pn2.org>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 2609

On 09.12.2024 13:03, Richard Damon wrote:
> On 12/9/24 4:04 AM, WM wrote:
>> On 08.12.2024 19:01, Jim Burns wrote:
>>
>>> You (WM) are considering
>>> infinite dark.finite.cardinals,
>>> which do not exist.
>>>
>> Then analysis is contradicted in set theory.
>> ∀n ∈ ℕ: E(1)∩E(2)∩...∩E(n) = E(n).
>> The limit of the left-hand side is empty, the limit of the right-hand 
>> side is full, i.e. not empty.
>> I do not tolerate that.
>>
> By your logic, 1 equals 0, 

No, that are two different sequences.

Regards, WM