Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Moebius <invalid@example.invalid>
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers
 (extra-ordinary)
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2024 07:59:18 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 24
Message-ID: <viu7c7$26h5g$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vg7cp8$9jka$1@dont-email.me> <vier32$1madr$1@dont-email.me>
 <vierv5$1l1ot$2@dont-email.me> <viiqfd$2qq41$5@dont-email.me>
 <vijhrd$34mp8$1@dont-email.me> <vilh59$3k21l$5@dont-email.me>
 <vilheq$3ks01$3@dont-email.me> <vilhjk$3k21l$9@dont-email.me>
 <vilhk8$3ks01$4@dont-email.me> <vilhnl$3k21l$10@dont-email.me>
 <viljdo$3k21l$12@dont-email.me> <87frn50zjp.fsf@bsb.me.uk>
 <vinuvc$cdlu$1@dont-email.me> <vinvvu$c7p5$6@dont-email.me>
 <vio0u4$c7p5$8@dont-email.me> <vio8rj$ei97$5@dont-email.me>
 <vio9nu$f13q$1@dont-email.me> <vip1f1$npsr$2@dont-email.me>
 <vipaue$qd3r$1@dont-email.me> <87y10vzo35.fsf@bsb.me.uk>
 <vipf6v$qr8p$2@dont-email.me> <87ser3zgez.fsf@bsb.me.uk>
 <viqca6$12cut$2@dont-email.me> <virpnj$1g4uq$1@dont-email.me>
 <ff5ee533dd180eb24978c76e7e00ba6f4676d51a@i2pn2.org>
 <vis3iq$1iu5p$1@dont-email.me> <visafv$1kq6a$1@dont-email.me>
 <vitgfu$1u0mg$2@dont-email.me>
Reply-To: invalid@example.invalid
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2024 07:59:20 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="264de29ac4942d9c683be6cd16be928f";
	logging-data="2311344"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19Em8TOCo8Fo8XxPGq7UMyF"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:5GHIJO+bCZPvWqGAD/YL0Z8OlQk=
In-Reply-To: <vitgfu$1u0mg$2@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: de-DE
Bytes: 2969

Am 06.12.2024 um 01:28 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:
> On 12/5/2024 5:40 AM, FromTheRafters wrote:
>> WM used his keyboard to write :
>>> On 05.12.2024 11:53, joes wrote:
>>>> Am Thu, 05 Dec 2024 09:54:11 +0100 schrieb WM:
>>>>> On 04.12.2024 20:59, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Not sure why WM thinks that Cantor Pairing does not work with any
>>>>>> natural number... I think I am not misunderstanding WM here.
>>>>> Take any natnumber you can. Almost all natnumbers are following.
>>>>> Infinitely many of them cannot be "taken" or "given" and cannot be
>>>>> proven to be in any mapping. But Cantor claims that all without any
>>>>> exception can be taken.
>>>> Yes, of course they can? Why shouldn't they? What does it mean to you?
>>>>
>>> All means all with no exception. But every number you can take 
>>> belongs to a vanishing subset of ℕ.
>>
>> What do you mean by vanishing?

"vanishingly small" in comparison to the (infinite) rest.

> Perhaps his brain in a toilet after a couple of flushes? Ugggh...