Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: joes <noreply@example.org>
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers
 (extra-ordinary)
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2024 19:06:44 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <9eaeab963bd5f3825f745c8990c9901a690f9eba@i2pn2.org>
References: <vg7cp8$9jka$1@dont-email.me> <vi41rg$3cj8q$1@dont-email.me>
	<d124760c-9ff9-479f-b687-482c108adf68@att.net>
	<vi56or$3j04f$1@dont-email.me>
	<4a810760-86a1-44bb-a191-28f70e0b361b@att.net>
	<vi6uc3$3v0dn$4@dont-email.me>
	<b2d7ee1f-33ab-44b6-ac90-558ac2f768a7@att.net> <vi7tnf$4oqa$1@dont-email.me>
	<23311c1a-1487-4ee4-a822-cd965bd024a0@att.net>
	<e9eb6455-ed0e-43f6-9a53-61aa3757d22d@tha.de>
	<71758f338eb239b7419418f49dfd8177c59d778b@i2pn2.org>
	<via83s$jk72$2@dont-email.me> <viag8h$lvep$1@dont-email.me>
	<viaj9q$l91n$1@dont-email.me> <vibvfo$10t7o$1@dont-email.me>
	<vic6m9$11mrq$4@dont-email.me> <vicbp2$1316h$1@dont-email.me>
	<vid4ts$1777k$2@dont-email.me> <vidcv3$18pdu$1@dont-email.me>
	<bdbc0e3d-1db2-4d6a-9f71-368d36d96b40@tha.de> <vier32$1madr$1@dont-email.me>
	<vierv5$1l1ot$2@dont-email.me> <viiqfd$2qq41$5@dont-email.me>
	<vik73d$3a9jm$1@dont-email.me> <vikg6c$3c4tu$1@dont-email.me>
	<vikkom$3ds36$1@dont-email.me> <vikoi8$3e7kd$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2024 19:06:44 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="948213"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="nS1KMHaUuWOnF/ukOJzx6Ssd8y16q9UPs1GZ+I3D0CM";
User-Agent: Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a
 git.gnome.org/pan2)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 2657
Lines: 18

Am Mon, 02 Dec 2024 17:51:22 +0100 schrieb WM:
> On 02.12.2024 16:46, FromTheRafters wrote:
>> WM wrote :
> 
>>> E(1), E(2), E(3), ...
>>> and E(1), E(1)∩E(2), E(1)∩E(2)∩E(3), ...
>>> are identical for every n and in the limit because E(1)∩E(2)∩...∩E(n)
>>> = E(n).
>> Non sequitur. That which is true for finite sequences is not
>> necessarily true for infinite sequences.
> As easily can be obtaied from the above it is necessarily true that up
> to every term and therefore also in the limit the sequences of
> endsegments and of intersections are identical. Every contrary opinion
> is matheology, outside of mathematics.
What is the limit?

-- 
Am Sat, 20 Jul 2024 12:35:31 +0000 schrieb WM in sci.math:
It is not guaranteed that n+1 exists for every n.